<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor Wi-Fi Reception? Blame Baby Monitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/05/18/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/05/18/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WWD&#8217;s 2009 in Review, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/05/18/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/#comment-335121</link>
		<dc:creator>WWD&#8217;s 2009 in Review, Part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=12887#comment-335121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] gear news, the Verizon MiFi 3G router went on sale, while I pointed to a report that blamed poor Wi-Fi performance on baby monitors. I reviewed new &#8220;computational knowledge engine&#8221; Wolfram Alpha, while Sam tried out [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gear news, the Verizon MiFi 3G router went on sale, while I pointed to a report that blamed poor Wi-Fi performance on baby monitors. I reviewed new &#8220;computational knowledge engine&#8221; Wolfram Alpha, while Sam tried out [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwayne</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/05/18/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/#comment-331277</link>
		<dc:creator>dwayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=12887#comment-331277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Haha, nice pic...straight out of my flickr photostream :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have a baby monitor (and a few in neighboring houses) and a few wireless phones and my WiFi is pretty solid.  Using a D-Link DIR-655 router FWIW.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, nice pic&#8230;straight out of my flickr photostream :)</p>

<p>I have a baby monitor (and a few in neighboring houses) and a few wireless phones and my WiFi is pretty solid.  Using a D-Link DIR-655 router FWIW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/05/18/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/#comment-317277</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=12887#comment-317277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I found that the Wii internet kills my wireless, so I disbaled this function on the Wii - problem solved.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that the Wii internet kills my wireless, so I disbaled this function on the Wii &#8211; problem solved.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poor Wi-Fi Reception? Blame Baby Monitors — cafedave.net</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/05/18/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/#comment-317059</link>
		<dc:creator>Poor Wi-Fi Reception? Blame Baby Monitors — cafedave.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=12887#comment-317059</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Could your wifi be having trouble because of your baby monitor? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Could your wifi be having trouble because of your baby monitor? [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
