<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cellity: Another Contender for Address Book 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/12/29/cellity-another-contender-for-address-book-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/12/29/cellity-another-contender-for-address-book-20/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:27:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarik</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/12/29/cellity-another-contender-for-address-book-20/#comment-310187</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5872#comment-310187</guid>
		<description>Thanks Imran for the great review of cellity addressbook 2.0. 

Just one thing: cellity will always respect the privacy of the users, period. 

For more info: http://www.cellity.com/legal/privacy-policy.html

@Richard It took us almost a year to develop cellity address book 2.0. We completely believe it to be a phantastic service that really solves the great pain point of multiple contacts with different data on multiple platforms. 

So we will not mess with it. People from our team have helped building successes like Xing.com before and I can assure you they know exactly how important it is to respect the privacy of the user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Imran for the great review of cellity addressbook 2.0. </p>
<p>Just one thing: cellity will always respect the privacy of the users, period. </p>
<p>For more info: <a href="http://www.cellity.com/legal/privacy-policy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cellity.com/legal/privacy-policy.html</a></p>
<p>@Richard It took us almost a year to develop cellity address book 2.0. We completely believe it to be a phantastic service that really solves the great pain point of multiple contacts with different data on multiple platforms. </p>
<p>So we will not mess with it. People from our team have helped building successes like Xing.com before and I can assure you they know exactly how important it is to respect the privacy of the user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Garside</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/12/29/cellity-another-contender-for-address-book-20/#comment-310186</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Garside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5872#comment-310186</guid>
		<description>I never give my account details to a different service. I don&#039;t understand why more don&#039;t use OAuth. I was particalarly surprised when a big service like Twitter recently asked for my Google/Hotmail/Yahoo login details.

It&#039;s just setting people up to get Phished.

I&#039;m waiting for a decentralised Address Book based on microformats and OAuth. An Open Source one would be even nicer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never give my account details to a different service. I don&#8217;t understand why more don&#8217;t use OAuth. I was particalarly surprised when a big service like Twitter recently asked for my Google/Hotmail/Yahoo login details.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just setting people up to get Phished.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting for a decentralised Address Book based on microformats and OAuth. An Open Source one would be even nicer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
