<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google SearchWiki: Blessing or Boondoggle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/24/google-searchwiki-blessing-or-boondoggle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/24/google-searchwiki-blessing-or-boondoggle/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:13:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thisismyurl</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/24/google-searchwiki-blessing-or-boondoggle/#comment-309075</link>
		<dc:creator>thisismyurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5277#comment-309075</guid>
		<description>The one Google feature that I&#039;ve been simply dying to see and haven&#039;t (but your x icon got me all excited) would be the ability to  blacklist sites from my search results.

Personally, I do a lot of searching for technical questions related to PHP routines and there&#039;s a certain site which charges money for answers that I absolutely hate, I&#039;ll never use them ... so I&#039;d kill for a way to remove the site from all future web searches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one Google feature that I&#8217;ve been simply dying to see and haven&#8217;t (but your x icon got me all excited) would be the ability to  blacklist sites from my search results.</p>
<p>Personally, I do a lot of searching for technical questions related to PHP routines and there&#8217;s a certain site which charges money for answers that I absolutely hate, I&#8217;ll never use them &#8230; so I&#8217;d kill for a way to remove the site from all future web searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Nelson</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/24/google-searchwiki-blessing-or-boondoggle/#comment-309045</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5277#comment-309045</guid>
		<description>Is nobody going to mention search.wikia.com?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is nobody going to mention search.wikia.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v1.1.6 - SearchWiki Compatibility</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/24/google-searchwiki-blessing-or-boondoggle/#comment-309037</link>
		<dc:creator>v1.1.6 - SearchWiki Compatibility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5277#comment-309037</guid>
		<description>[...] (11/24/08) - Darrell Etherington at Web Worker Daily, writing a post about the new SearchWiki, coincidentally enough also have Surf Canyon installed, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (11/24/08) &#8211; Darrell Etherington at Web Worker Daily, writing a post about the new SearchWiki, coincidentally enough also have Surf Canyon installed, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cramer</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/24/google-searchwiki-blessing-or-boondoggle/#comment-309036</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5277#comment-309036</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Darrell, for the mention. And for using our application! We&#039;re please to hear that you like it.

We think there&#039;s actually an interesting compatibility between SearchWiki and Surf Canyon. The former is real-time explicit personalization - users can manually move results around. The latter is real-time implicit personalization - results are automatically moved around based on implicit signals. We believe that the two work together nicely, but we always appreciate feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Darrell, for the mention. And for using our application! We&#8217;re please to hear that you like it.</p>
<p>We think there&#8217;s actually an interesting compatibility between SearchWiki and Surf Canyon. The former is real-time explicit personalization &#8211; users can manually move results around. The latter is real-time implicit personalization &#8211; results are automatically moved around based on implicit signals. We believe that the two work together nicely, but we always appreciate feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More About Googles&#8217; SearchWiki &#124; Art Schobey Interactive</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/24/google-searchwiki-blessing-or-boondoggle/#comment-309028</link>
		<dc:creator>More About Googles&#8217; SearchWiki &#124; Art Schobey Interactive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5277#comment-309028</guid>
		<description>[...] Google SearchWiki: Blessing or Boondoggle? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google SearchWiki: Blessing or Boondoggle? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
