<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parallels Desktop 4 vs. VMware Fusion 2: The Web Worker Angle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-332175</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-332175</guid>
		<description>I was amazed at how much faster Sun&#039;s VirtualBox is compared to Parallels and it&#039;s free. I regret paying for my Parallels license now as I never use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was amazed at how much faster Sun&#8217;s VirtualBox is compared to Parallels and it&#8217;s free. I regret paying for my Parallels license now as I never use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-323468</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-323468</guid>
		<description>I have a question. I have a Mac Book Pro with partition running an OEM version of XP. I tried Parallels and, once installed and run, I can no longer boot into XP. SO I must only run Windows via Parallels. And Parallels support was really unhelpful. I want to be able to do both, boot into XP directly and through the virtual machine. WOUld Fusion enable me to do that?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question. I have a Mac Book Pro with partition running an OEM version of XP. I tried Parallels and, once installed and run, I can no longer boot into XP. SO I must only run Windows via Parallels. And Parallels support was really unhelpful. I want to be able to do both, boot into XP directly and through the virtual machine. WOUld Fusion enable me to do that?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-319641</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-319641</guid>
		<description>I am due for a new PC and would really like to get an Imac.  But the missing link is Parallels or Fusion being able to fill the gap so that I can continue to use the apps that are PC only.  The lack of support from either company means that this is not ready for prime time and still is in the &quot;bleeding edge&quot; stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am due for a new PC and would really like to get an Imac.  But the missing link is Parallels or Fusion being able to fill the gap so that I can continue to use the apps that are PC only.  The lack of support from either company means that this is not ready for prime time and still is in the &#8220;bleeding edge&#8221; stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bo zhong</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-319563</link>
		<dc:creator>bo zhong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-319563</guid>
		<description>Having tried both fusion and parallels 3 and 4, for basic stuff like excel, word, surfing the internet, plus some unique stuff [updating using a usb device for datacards], speed is not noticeable between the two [maybe fusion is a bit faster]. However, usb connectivity is *much* better with fusion. BUT what makes fusion *much better* for my institution is customer support–parallels customer support is non-existent! You have to purchase each upgrade, and pay *again* if you malware or whatever crashes your machine and you need to download the program again. As well, several emails to support went totally unanswered.
So performance-wise, advantage to fusion, particularly if you use usb peripherals; with respect to customer service, parallels gets an F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having tried both fusion and parallels 3 and 4, for basic stuff like excel, word, surfing the internet, plus some unique stuff [updating using a usb device for datacards], speed is not noticeable between the two [maybe fusion is a bit faster]. However, usb connectivity is *much* better with fusion. BUT what makes fusion *much better* for my institution is customer support–parallels customer support is non-existent! You have to purchase each upgrade, and pay *again* if you malware or whatever crashes your machine and you need to download the program again. As well, several emails to support went totally unanswered.<br />
So performance-wise, advantage to fusion, particularly if you use usb peripherals; with respect to customer service, parallels gets an F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testing IE on a Mac &#124; Chad Things</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-316352</link>
		<dc:creator>Testing IE on a Mac &#124; Chad Things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-316352</guid>
		<description>[...] Differences: Both are very similar, Parallels 15% faster than Fusion (src), Fusion better (src2, src3) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Differences: Both are very similar, Parallels 15% faster than Fusion (src), Fusion better (src2, src3) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-310451</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-310451</guid>
		<description>I just upgraded from Parallels desktop v2 to 4 this afternoon. The upgrade process was a little scary since it needed to convert my Disk Image files from the old to the new format. The converter reported that the image failed to convert, three times! (@  25%, 50% and 75% completion.) Each time I installed the Parallels Tools from the menu (&quot;Parallels Tools&quot; are Windows device drivers for the emulated hardware) and the progress bar would jump ahead 5-10% then slow to a crawl for a half hour before finally stopping and reporting the aforementioned error. Lather, rinse, repeat. 

Conversion of my 15GB drive image took about an hour. Final result? Everything&#039;s working, though WinXP is demanding I &#039;reauthorize&#039; it since it believes it&#039;s running on new hardware.

Graphics performance seems better on my original white Macbook (2ghz, 2GB Ram). I&#039;ve not run any timed tests, but in general useage application launch times &amp; runtimes feel about the same. (I use XP for software development, running Visual Studio 2008 &amp; Oracle 10g)

Gotta agree with Rick, support from both Parallels and VMWare leaves much to be desired.

Why did I choose Parallels over VMWare? Feature-wise, it&#039;s about the same as Fusion. In the end it came down to one thing: Familiarity. I&#039;ve been using Parallels Desktop for over a year and it feels comfortable. Wish I had a better reason than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just upgraded from Parallels desktop v2 to 4 this afternoon. The upgrade process was a little scary since it needed to convert my Disk Image files from the old to the new format. The converter reported that the image failed to convert, three times! (@  25%, 50% and 75% completion.) Each time I installed the Parallels Tools from the menu (&#8220;Parallels Tools&#8221; are Windows device drivers for the emulated hardware) and the progress bar would jump ahead 5-10% then slow to a crawl for a half hour before finally stopping and reporting the aforementioned error. Lather, rinse, repeat. </p>
<p>Conversion of my 15GB drive image took about an hour. Final result? Everything&#8217;s working, though WinXP is demanding I &#8216;reauthorize&#8217; it since it believes it&#8217;s running on new hardware.</p>
<p>Graphics performance seems better on my original white Macbook (2ghz, 2GB Ram). I&#8217;ve not run any timed tests, but in general useage application launch times &amp; runtimes feel about the same. (I use XP for software development, running Visual Studio 2008 &amp; Oracle 10g)</p>
<p>Gotta agree with Rick, support from both Parallels and VMWare leaves much to be desired.</p>
<p>Why did I choose Parallels over VMWare? Feature-wise, it&#8217;s about the same as Fusion. In the end it came down to one thing: Familiarity. I&#8217;ve been using Parallels Desktop for over a year and it feels comfortable. Wish I had a better reason than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RDW</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-310396</link>
		<dc:creator>RDW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-310396</guid>
		<description>Well, as a new mac user, I downloaded both the trial versions of Fusion 2.0 and Parallels 4.0.  

I have to say that I prefer Paralles much better than Fusion. They both were easy to install and get Windows installed on the macbook Pro, but Parallels seemed to work the best for me.  Still getting used to the mac system, but right now, still like Windows better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as a new mac user, I downloaded both the trial versions of Fusion 2.0 and Parallels 4.0.  </p>
<p>I have to say that I prefer Paralles much better than Fusion. They both were easy to install and get Windows installed on the macbook Pro, but Parallels seemed to work the best for me.  Still getting used to the mac system, but right now, still like Windows better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worker</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-309906</link>
		<dc:creator>worker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-309906</guid>
		<description>Guys,

Before writing a shuch review please learn the documentation and applications itself. Both applications have Preferences &amp; Settings where you can specify many options. Just try and you will see the truth. 

Good look!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>Before writing a shuch review please learn the documentation and applications itself. Both applications have Preferences &amp; Settings where you can specify many options. Just try and you will see the truth. </p>
<p>Good look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The potential of a Cloud OS. &#171; stone city</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-309339</link>
		<dc:creator>The potential of a Cloud OS. &#171; stone city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-309339</guid>
		<description>[...] a freelancer, I have little cause to ever open Microsoft&#8217;s Office suite, unless I want to see how it performs in a new OS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a freelancer, I have little cause to ever open Microsoft&#8217;s Office suite, unless I want to see how it performs in a new OS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-309268</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 03:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-309268</guid>
		<description>On the support side, I think the &quot;penny is dropping&quot; (like a ton a bricks on my head, anyway).

NEITHER VMWare or Parallels provides real support. VMWare gives you &quot;free web access for 30 days&quot; and Parallels gives you, if I remember correctly, some limited web contact, but points you to their fora, etc.

They both want to sell you their &quot;per incidence&quot; support (taking a page from Mother Microsoft...)

I had HORRIBLE time with Parallels: 3.0 wouldn&#039;t launch in my OS X Leopard, and during install requested &quot;address for ethernet networking card&quot;. To some this may have been the equivalent of asking my name, but to me, I pored through the manual and came up blank. I solicited support from Parallels website, and NEVER HEARD BACK. Of course, they don&#039;t provide an email address in the web support function (nor a &quot;CC&quot; line), so I have no copy of my request. 

Time passed, I focused on other things, and when I finally revisited the issue, I did find a Customer Service number to call (bluffing my way past the requests for my &quot;support license&quot;). I was told to upgrade to 4.0 and all problems likely solved... but they only gave me a &quot;trial&quot; activation key. (I learned it was only a trial AFTER I installed Windows XP, so now, I have my &quot;single user&quot; licensed XP sitting on a virtual machine I can&#039;t access.)(They were offering a &quot;free upgrade to 4.0 for 3.0 users&quot; but only if you bought your [defective?] copy of 3.0 after a certain date.)

So, it was &quot;pay us again if you want to run the program you bought&quot; or... 

I&#039;m going to try (as in trial) VMWare, but I&#039;m more than anxious that their support is using the same &quot;buyer beware&quot; [bef***ked?] model.

Has the world simply capitulated to software sellers? (Ever try to buy a non-Mac computer without Windows installed? I was going to simply go buy a machine and upload Windows XP, but silly me, I could find no such thing...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the support side, I think the &#8220;penny is dropping&#8221; (like a ton a bricks on my head, anyway).</p>
<p>NEITHER VMWare or Parallels provides real support. VMWare gives you &#8220;free web access for 30 days&#8221; and Parallels gives you, if I remember correctly, some limited web contact, but points you to their fora, etc.</p>
<p>They both want to sell you their &#8220;per incidence&#8221; support (taking a page from Mother Microsoft&#8230;)</p>
<p>I had HORRIBLE time with Parallels: 3.0 wouldn&#8217;t launch in my OS X Leopard, and during install requested &#8220;address for ethernet networking card&#8221;. To some this may have been the equivalent of asking my name, but to me, I pored through the manual and came up blank. I solicited support from Parallels website, and NEVER HEARD BACK. Of course, they don&#8217;t provide an email address in the web support function (nor a &#8220;CC&#8221; line), so I have no copy of my request. </p>
<p>Time passed, I focused on other things, and when I finally revisited the issue, I did find a Customer Service number to call (bluffing my way past the requests for my &#8220;support license&#8221;). I was told to upgrade to 4.0 and all problems likely solved&#8230; but they only gave me a &#8220;trial&#8221; activation key. (I learned it was only a trial AFTER I installed Windows XP, so now, I have my &#8220;single user&#8221; licensed XP sitting on a virtual machine I can&#8217;t access.)(They were offering a &#8220;free upgrade to 4.0 for 3.0 users&#8221; but only if you bought your [defective?] copy of 3.0 after a certain date.)</p>
<p>So, it was &#8220;pay us again if you want to run the program you bought&#8221; or&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try (as in trial) VMWare, but I&#8217;m more than anxious that their support is using the same &#8220;buyer beware&#8221; [bef***ked?] model.</p>
<p>Has the world simply capitulated to software sellers? (Ever try to buy a non-Mac computer without Windows installed? I was going to simply go buy a machine and upload Windows XP, but silly me, I could find no such thing&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac vs. Windows Virtualization Software 2.0 &#171; Milwaukee Web Media</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-308999</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac vs. Windows Virtualization Software 2.0 &#171; Milwaukee Web Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-308999</guid>
		<description>[...] Mac vs. Windows Virtualization Software&#160;2.0  Jump to Comments “Which is better… this or that?” It is human nature to compare things, routes to take, fruits at the supermarket, even apples and oranges. However, in software sometimes things do some much of the same thing, it is is difficult to come to a conclusion without a “hands on” experience that let’s you taste the full flavor of a product or service. Thankfully, when you have a resource that you can trust, coming to a decision makes this easier. That is why my hat is off to Web Worker Daily and the GigaOm Network for posting such a comparison on their blog here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mac vs. Windows Virtualization Software&nbsp;2.0  Jump to Comments “Which is better… this or that?” It is human nature to compare things, routes to take, fruits at the supermarket, even apples and oranges. However, in software sometimes things do some much of the same thing, it is is difficult to come to a conclusion without a “hands on” experience that let’s you taste the full flavor of a product or service. Thankfully, when you have a resource that you can trust, coming to a decision makes this easier. That is why my hat is off to Web Worker Daily and the GigaOm Network for posting such a comparison on their blog here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac vs. Windows Virtualization Software 2.0 &#171; Thunk Different.</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-308996</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac vs. Windows Virtualization Software 2.0 &#171; Thunk Different.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-308996</guid>
		<description>[...] Mac vs. Windows Virtualization Software&#160;2.0  &#8220;Which is better&#8230; this or that?&#8221; It is human nature to compare things, routes to take, fruits at the supermarket, even apples and oranges. However, in software sometimes things do some much of the same thing, it is is difficult to come to a conclusion without a &#8220;hands on&#8221; experience that let&#8217;s you taste the full flavor of a product or service. Thankfully, when you have a resource that you can trust, coming to a decision makes this easier. That is why my hat is off to Web Worker Daily and the GigaOm Network for posting such a comparison on their blog here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mac vs. Windows Virtualization Software&nbsp;2.0  &#8220;Which is better&#8230; this or that?&#8221; It is human nature to compare things, routes to take, fruits at the supermarket, even apples and oranges. However, in software sometimes things do some much of the same thing, it is is difficult to come to a conclusion without a &#8220;hands on&#8221; experience that let&#8217;s you taste the full flavor of a product or service. Thankfully, when you have a resource that you can trust, coming to a decision makes this easier. That is why my hat is off to Web Worker Daily and the GigaOm Network for posting such a comparison on their blog here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-308909</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-308909</guid>
		<description>Some really useful Info and a solution:

VMware support did finally provide an answer to my question about using VirtualPC in a Fusion VM, this may be useful for some people:

&quot;VPC 07 will install in the XP virtual machine, but it will not operate properly.  It will not see available resources correctly and most virtual machines will fail to start.
    
Global Support Services
VMware Inc.&quot;

At least they did finally reply. I&#039;ve yet to receive any communication from Parallels at all although it is good to see Leto offering help.

SOLUTION 
For anyone who want to use Microsoft&#039;s VirtualPC images to test websites with different versions of IE, I&#039;ve found a solution. It&#039;s a guide on how to find and use an open source command line software which will convert Microsoft&#039;s .vhd files to .vmdk files with run on Fusion. There&#039;s also a solution for VirtualBox.

Be sure to read all the comments as some contain corrections to the original post:

http://blog.mozmonkey.com/category/software/

Hope this is useful to someone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some really useful Info and a solution:</p>
<p>VMware support did finally provide an answer to my question about using VirtualPC in a Fusion VM, this may be useful for some people:</p>
<p>&#8220;VPC 07 will install in the XP virtual machine, but it will not operate properly.  It will not see available resources correctly and most virtual machines will fail to start.</p>
<p>Global Support Services<br />
VMware Inc.&#8221;</p>
<p>At least they did finally reply. I&#8217;ve yet to receive any communication from Parallels at all although it is good to see Leto offering help.</p>
<p>SOLUTION<br />
For anyone who want to use Microsoft&#8217;s VirtualPC images to test websites with different versions of IE, I&#8217;ve found a solution. It&#8217;s a guide on how to find and use an open source command line software which will convert Microsoft&#8217;s .vhd files to .vmdk files with run on Fusion. There&#8217;s also a solution for VirtualBox.</p>
<p>Be sure to read all the comments as some contain corrections to the original post:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.mozmonkey.com/category/software/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mozmonkey.com/category/software/</a></p>
<p>Hope this is useful to someone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leto_Parallels</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-308813</link>
		<dc:creator>Leto_Parallels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-308813</guid>
		<description>Hello - I&#039;m Leto, Blogger for Parallels.
I really like the article, but I want to point out that it is possible to a move Windows window (windows windows windows?) to a second monitor when in Coherence with Parallels Desktop 4.0 for Mac. You just need to check &quot;Use multiple displays&quot; in the &quot;Virtual Machine &gt;&gt; Configure...&quot; then under &quot;Coherence&quot;.
It&#039;s the same place where you can change the settings for the Windows dock/taskbar.

If there are any user-related questions anyone has, please feel free to e-mail me at Leto@Parallels.com and I&#039;ll get them answered for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello &#8211; I&#8217;m Leto, Blogger for Parallels.<br />
I really like the article, but I want to point out that it is possible to a move Windows window (windows windows windows?) to a second monitor when in Coherence with Parallels Desktop 4.0 for Mac. You just need to check &#8220;Use multiple displays&#8221; in the &#8220;Virtual Machine &gt;&gt; Configure&#8230;&#8221; then under &#8220;Coherence&#8221;.<br />
It&#8217;s the same place where you can change the settings for the Windows dock/taskbar.</p>
<p>If there are any user-related questions anyone has, please feel free to e-mail me at <a href="mailto:Leto@Parallels.com">Leto@Parallels.com</a> and I&#8217;ll get them answered for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bites from the Apple: Hodgepodge &#8212; What I Would Buy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-308764</link>
		<dc:creator>Bites from the Apple: Hodgepodge &#8212; What I Would Buy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-308764</guid>
		<description>[...] Web Worker Daily places the two recently upgraded Windows virtualization software titles for the Mac OS&#8211;Parallels Desktop 4 and VMware Fusion 2&#8211;into its comparative thunder dome and finds that Fusion comes out on top (with better dependability and multi-monitor support). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web Worker Daily places the two recently upgraded Windows virtualization software titles for the Mac OS&#8211;Parallels Desktop 4 and VMware Fusion 2&#8211;into its comparative thunder dome and finds that Fusion comes out on top (with better dependability and multi-monitor support). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/11/13/parallels-desktop-4-vs-vmware-fusion-2-the-web-worker-angle/#comment-308744</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5030#comment-308744</guid>
		<description>@Darrell

Thanks for the info. I&#039;ve seen the thread you linked to already, so I&#039;ve been playing with trial versions of both Fusion 2 and Desktop 4 since posting - as you suggested. Bit of a problem in that Vmware Converter will not convert my existing Win XP install to a VM image so am purchasing a copy of Windows to test (I&#039;ll need it anyway for the MBP which is arriving). 

There&#039;s also another option I thought of: run MS VirtualPC 2007 on a VM image of WinXP. That way the VirtualPC images don&#039;t have to be converted at all. Somethign to try at least.

One final point/rant: you&#039;ll have gather I&#039;ve not much experience of virtualisation, it&#039;s a new subject to me.

I&#039;ve contacted Vmware with pre-sales questions and posted in their forums. I have to say that their support/attitude is not great. Forum response was just some condescending post about searching the forums before posting (which I did). Pre-sales question to VMware direct was just answered by referring me to the forums.

VMware should realise that their in a war with Parallels. Their product may have the slight edge but as more people switch to Mac or (as us) upgrade from PowerPC to Intel machines, there will be more demand for virtualisation from people with little knowledge. Can VMware really afford to treat prospective customers like this? What will aftersales support be like?

I&#039;ve asked Parallels the same pre-sales question and so far no reply at all. Early days yet so maybe it will change.

Footnote: on the positive side, it does underline how friendly the Mac community is in general. Thanks again Darrell for taking the time to answer my question  as well as you could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darrell</p>
<p>Thanks for the info. I&#8217;ve seen the thread you linked to already, so I&#8217;ve been playing with trial versions of both Fusion 2 and Desktop 4 since posting &#8211; as you suggested. Bit of a problem in that Vmware Converter will not convert my existing Win XP install to a VM image so am purchasing a copy of Windows to test (I&#8217;ll need it anyway for the MBP which is arriving). </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also another option I thought of: run MS VirtualPC 2007 on a VM image of WinXP. That way the VirtualPC images don&#8217;t have to be converted at all. Somethign to try at least.</p>
<p>One final point/rant: you&#8217;ll have gather I&#8217;ve not much experience of virtualisation, it&#8217;s a new subject to me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve contacted Vmware with pre-sales questions and posted in their forums. I have to say that their support/attitude is not great. Forum response was just some condescending post about searching the forums before posting (which I did). Pre-sales question to VMware direct was just answered by referring me to the forums.</p>
<p>VMware should realise that their in a war with Parallels. Their product may have the slight edge but as more people switch to Mac or (as us) upgrade from PowerPC to Intel machines, there will be more demand for virtualisation from people with little knowledge. Can VMware really afford to treat prospective customers like this? What will aftersales support be like?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve asked Parallels the same pre-sales question and so far no reply at all. Early days yet so maybe it will change.</p>
<p>Footnote: on the positive side, it does underline how friendly the Mac community is in general. Thanks again Darrell for taking the time to answer my question  as well as you could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
