<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome: Is it Ready for Web Workers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonathan</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-306051</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-306051</guid>
		<description>Chrome is really fast but it has its share of issues right now. It will be interesting to see how it progresses in the future. Here is a good article that talks a bit more about how it is and where it is going. . .

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightecho.com/index.php/internet-technology/smart-browsers-beyond-google-chrome&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Smart Browsers, Beyond Google Chrome&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome is really fast but it has its share of issues right now. It will be interesting to see how it progresses in the future. Here is a good article that talks a bit more about how it is and where it is going. . .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lightecho.com/index.php/internet-technology/smart-browsers-beyond-google-chrome" rel="nofollow">Smart Browsers, Beyond Google Chrome</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome - Birde benden dinleyin :D / Fatih Hayrioğlu&#8217;nun not defteri</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-306037</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome - Birde benden dinleyin :D / Fatih Hayrioğlu&#8217;nun not defteri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-306037</guid>
		<description>[...] http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/" rel="nofollow">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mājaslapu veidotāji &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Chrome - jauna Interneta pārlūkprogramma</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-305784</link>
		<dc:creator>Mājaslapu veidotāji &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Chrome - jauna Interneta pārlūkprogramma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-305784</guid>
		<description>[...] kurām saskārušies citu Interneta pārlūkprogrammu veidotāji. Kā izteicies viens autors iekš WebWorkerDaily, ar tiem risinājumiem, ko piedāvā Google Chrome, to var nosaukt par rītdienas Interneta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kurām saskārušies citu Interneta pārlūkprogrammu veidotāji. Kā izteicies viens autors iekš WebWorkerDaily, ar tiem risinājumiem, ko piedāvā Google Chrome, to var nosaukt par rītdienas Interneta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMail Chrome Combination Rocks &#171; Pubdomains - Domain Registration * Web Hosting * SSL Certificates</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-304113</link>
		<dc:creator>GMail Chrome Combination Rocks &#171; Pubdomains - Domain Registration * Web Hosting * SSL Certificates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-304113</guid>
		<description>[...] WebWorkerDaily » Archive Google Chrome: Is it Ready for Web Workers? « 2 Sep 2008 &#8230; I have 4 Google accounts, 3 Google Apps and one regular Gmail, and Chrome quickly got confused remembering which username/password went with &#8230; webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/ - 39k [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WebWorkerDaily » Archive Google Chrome: Is it Ready for Web Workers? « 2 Sep 2008 &#8230; I have 4 Google accounts, 3 Google Apps and one regular Gmail, and Chrome quickly got confused remembering which username/password went with &#8230; webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/ &#8211; 39k [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive JOBLOGS Creates Web Workspaces For You and Your Clients &#171;</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303991</link>
		<dc:creator>WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive JOBLOGS Creates Web Workspaces For You and Your Clients &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303991</guid>
		<description>[...] of web applications. Earlier this week I got a sneak peek at Staction, yesterday saw the release of Google&#8217;s Chrome, and today I get to discuss [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of web applications. Earlier this week I got a sneak peek at Staction, yesterday saw the release of Google&#8217;s Chrome, and today I get to discuss [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mājaslapa &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Chrome - jauna Interneta pārlūkprogramma</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303975</link>
		<dc:creator>Mājaslapa &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Chrome - jauna Interneta pārlūkprogramma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303975</guid>
		<description>[...] kurām saskārušies citu Interneta pārlūkprogrammu veidotāji. Kā izteicies viens autors iekš WebWorkerDaily, ar tiem risinājumiem, ko piedāvā Google Chrome, to var nosaukt par rītdienas Interneta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kurām saskārušies citu Interneta pārlūkprogrammu veidotāji. Kā izteicies viens autors iekš WebWorkerDaily, ar tiem risinājumiem, ko piedāvā Google Chrome, to var nosaukt par rītdienas Interneta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303974</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303974</guid>
		<description>Mmm.. I&#039;m trying it out and so far it&#039;s pretty fast. The design is very nice. It seems as if I have lots more space. No trouble yet, but after only a day that doesn&#039;t say much. I really like it already though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm.. I&#8217;m trying it out and so far it&#8217;s pretty fast. The design is very nice. It seems as if I have lots more space. No trouble yet, but after only a day that doesn&#8217;t say much. I really like it already though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303970</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303970</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is fast. I love the lack of clutter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is fast. I love the lack of clutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-09-02 at James A. Arconati</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303957</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-09-02 at James A. Arconati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303957</guid>
		<description>[...] WebWorkerDaily » Archive Google Chrome: Is it Ready for Web Workers? « As if we didn’t have enough to juggle, Google adds their own browser to the mix. Google Chrome was released a few hours ago for Windows XP &amp; Vista. A Mac version is promised at some point. Even though I’m a Mac user, it was worth a launch of VMWare Fusion to take the new kid on the block for a spin. Initial impression? Nice start. I’m certainly not going to shout from the rooftops because Google puts its tabs above the address bar. Yes, it’s different. But in some areas of the browser it feels different for different’s sake which does nothing for productivity. What sets Chrome apart, clearly, is how it manages resources. The browser is the operating system, and like with any modern OS each application is handled separately. I think of all us who live in Firefox know what it’s like to have 30 tabs open and be stuck because one is being ornery. (tags: google google/chrome web-developer reference 2008) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WebWorkerDaily » Archive Google Chrome: Is it Ready for Web Workers? « As if we didn’t have enough to juggle, Google adds their own browser to the mix. Google Chrome was released a few hours ago for Windows XP &amp; Vista. A Mac version is promised at some point. Even though I’m a Mac user, it was worth a launch of VMWare Fusion to take the new kid on the block for a spin. Initial impression? Nice start. I’m certainly not going to shout from the rooftops because Google puts its tabs above the address bar. Yes, it’s different. But in some areas of the browser it feels different for different’s sake which does nothing for productivity. What sets Chrome apart, clearly, is how it manages resources. The browser is the operating system, and like with any modern OS each application is handled separately. I think of all us who live in Firefox know what it’s like to have 30 tabs open and be stuck because one is being ornery. (tags: google google/chrome web-developer reference 2008) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PawEng &#187; Google Chrome Released</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303949</link>
		<dc:creator>PawEng &#187; Google Chrome Released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303949</guid>
		<description>[...] Web Worker Daily asks whether Chrome is Ready for web workers? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web Worker Daily asks whether Chrome is Ready for web workers? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gale</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303945</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303945</guid>
		<description>The user agent string looks like

&lt;strong&gt;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The user agent string looks like</p>
<p><strong>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gale</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303944</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303944</guid>
		<description>Quick thoughts:

1)  Initial reaction, there are enough browsers, another one is probably a burden.

2)  Second thought.  I don&#039;t think Google knows how to do Desktop apps, can they be trusted.  We&#039;ll see.

3)  Install had a major blunder.  It doesn&#039;t let me install it where I want to.  I usually throw stuff away if it does that, but I&#039;ll make an exception.

4)  Seems to grab a lot of settings and even accepts a non Google search engine for that search bar (which I don&#039;t use anyway).  Not bad.

5)  Quick browse to four or five sites that I know are made up of decent well checked XHTML.  Seems to work with them all, and it&#039;s snappy.  Has a pre-fetch.  This is impressive.

6)  Go to one site with valid markup but whose design is (in my view) a bit odd.  Seems to work well.

7)  Did I mention it&#039;s snappy!

Overall worth a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick thoughts:</p>
<p>1)  Initial reaction, there are enough browsers, another one is probably a burden.</p>
<p>2)  Second thought.  I don&#8217;t think Google knows how to do Desktop apps, can they be trusted.  We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>3)  Install had a major blunder.  It doesn&#8217;t let me install it where I want to.  I usually throw stuff away if it does that, but I&#8217;ll make an exception.</p>
<p>4)  Seems to grab a lot of settings and even accepts a non Google search engine for that search bar (which I don&#8217;t use anyway).  Not bad.</p>
<p>5)  Quick browse to four or five sites that I know are made up of decent well checked XHTML.  Seems to work with them all, and it&#8217;s snappy.  Has a pre-fetch.  This is impressive.</p>
<p>6)  Go to one site with valid markup but whose design is (in my view) a bit odd.  Seems to work well.</p>
<p>7)  Did I mention it&#8217;s snappy!</p>
<p>Overall worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303943</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303943</guid>
		<description>To give people a taste of Chrome and how much better it is at JavaScript:

Try going to http://dromaeo.com/

Chrome total score: 1147.40ms

Firefox 3: 3089.80ms

Opera: 2839.00ms

IE7: Crashes

Chrome was almost 2000ms faster than Firefox 3 and was almost 1700ms faster than Opera.  IE7 doesn&#039;t even work with that site, it would crash every time I visited and then Firefox 3 crashed as IE messed up Windows Explorer, but yet Chrome survived.

So in short, Chrome loaded and ran JavaScript in 1/3rd the time of Firefox 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To give people a taste of Chrome and how much better it is at JavaScript:</p>
<p>Try going to <a href="http://dromaeo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://dromaeo.com/</a></p>
<p>Chrome total score: 1147.40ms</p>
<p>Firefox 3: 3089.80ms</p>
<p>Opera: 2839.00ms</p>
<p>IE7: Crashes</p>
<p>Chrome was almost 2000ms faster than Firefox 3 and was almost 1700ms faster than Opera.  IE7 doesn&#8217;t even work with that site, it would crash every time I visited and then Firefox 3 crashed as IE messed up Windows Explorer, but yet Chrome survived.</p>
<p>So in short, Chrome loaded and ran JavaScript in 1/3rd the time of Firefox 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Andrews</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303936</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303936</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t heard anything about Google Chrome.  No one seems to be talking about it [/sarcasm]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t heard anything about Google Chrome.  No one seems to be talking about it [/sarcasm]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Reidy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303935</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Reidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303935</guid>
		<description>To me this is yet another example of Google throwing an application together and then throwing it out there to see what happens. If it catches on great, if not then they will sunset it. Or maybe its just to annoy and frustrate microsoft (Android is another example of this for me). What must the folks at FireFox think though? I would not be impressed if I were them. 
For me google have already shown that they lack any innovation (unlike say apple...but like MS funnily enough). Almost all their decent products were bought (except gmail right?) and now they are just re-writing it all in gears. 
And their motto is &quot;Do no Evil?&quot;....no how about this...&quot;Do?, No!, Evil!!&quot;  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me this is yet another example of Google throwing an application together and then throwing it out there to see what happens. If it catches on great, if not then they will sunset it. Or maybe its just to annoy and frustrate microsoft (Android is another example of this for me). What must the folks at FireFox think though? I would not be impressed if I were them.<br />
For me google have already shown that they lack any innovation (unlike say apple&#8230;but like MS funnily enough). Almost all their decent products were bought (except gmail right?) and now they are just re-writing it all in gears.<br />
And their motto is &#8220;Do no Evil?&#8221;&#8230;.no how about this&#8230;&#8221;Do?, No!, Evil!!&#8221;  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Martin</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-it-ready-for-web-workers/#comment-303932</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=3665#comment-303932</guid>
		<description>Point of this browser is the same as Apple&#039;s Safari for Windows. This is the browser (or at least a close approximation) of the browser that is going to be available for Android. They need users/developers to get familiar with it. Their emphasis on improving JavaScript support and speed should make Adobe rather than Microsoft nervous. We could now have another widely deployed mobile platform with excellent JavaScript making mobile flash a non issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point of this browser is the same as Apple&#8217;s Safari for Windows. This is the browser (or at least a close approximation) of the browser that is going to be available for Android. They need users/developers to get familiar with it. Their emphasis on improving JavaScript support and speed should make Adobe rather than Microsoft nervous. We could now have another widely deployed mobile platform with excellent JavaScript making mobile flash a non issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
