<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet-Enabled Autos and the Web Worker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/25/internet-autos-web-worker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/25/internet-autos-web-worker/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel Strellner</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/25/internet-autos-web-worker/#comment-303304</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Strellner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=3495#comment-303304</guid>
		<description>I think they need to work on automatically driving cars before they release stuff like this.  I am all for it, and knowing me I would probably pay the $450 for it.

By making cars that automatically drive themselves, then we can be free to browse the internet, watch movies, etc.

IMO that should be the #1 focus for technology from car makers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they need to work on automatically driving cars before they release stuff like this.  I am all for it, and knowing me I would probably pay the $450 for it.</p>
<p>By making cars that automatically drive themselves, then we can be free to browse the internet, watch movies, etc.</p>
<p>IMO that should be the #1 focus for technology from car makers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cubicle Generation</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/25/internet-autos-web-worker/#comment-303300</link>
		<dc:creator>Cubicle Generation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=3495#comment-303300</guid>
		<description>You can just get a Sprint AIR Card, and a Feeney router, and a cigarette lighter -&gt; AC/DC adapater to rig up an internet enabled local area network in your car for cheaper than $450. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can just get a Sprint AIR Card, and a Feeney router, and a cigarette lighter -&gt; AC/DC adapater to rig up an internet enabled local area network in your car for cheaper than $450. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/25/internet-autos-web-worker/#comment-303284</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=3495#comment-303284</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;more distractions lead to more accidents.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

More distractions &lt;em&gt;for the driver&lt;/em&gt; lead to more accidents.  I know that a lot of people do a lot of stupid things while driving, but does that mean we should eliminate useful or enjoyable &lt;em&gt;passenger&lt;/em&gt; features?

I don&#039;t know that I&#039;d pay $450, but I&#039;d love to have WiFi in my car on road trips so that my passengers could stay connected (and leave me the hell alone while I drive :-P).  

I&#039;d never use it while actively driving; just like I always use hands-free for my phone, and always tell the person on the other end that I&#039;m on the road, and so may need to ask them to repeat things (when something is going on that needs extra attention, I tune out the conversation until that something is dealt with).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>more distractions lead to more accidents.</p></blockquote>
<p>More distractions <em>for the driver</em> lead to more accidents.  I know that a lot of people do a lot of stupid things while driving, but does that mean we should eliminate useful or enjoyable <em>passenger</em> features?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;d pay $450, but I&#8217;d love to have WiFi in my car on road trips so that my passengers could stay connected (and leave me the hell alone while I drive :-P).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d never use it while actively driving; just like I always use hands-free for my phone, and always tell the person on the other end that I&#8217;m on the road, and so may need to ask them to repeat things (when something is going on that needs extra attention, I tune out the conversation until that something is dealt with).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khürt</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/08/25/internet-autos-web-worker/#comment-303253</link>
		<dc:creator>Khürt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=3495#comment-303253</guid>
		<description>&quot;web workers are probably smart enough to not be driving with a laptop in their lap&quot; ... true ... but what about the morons who will have more money than brains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;web workers are probably smart enough to not be driving with a laptop in their lap&#8221; &#8230; true &#8230; but what about the morons who will have more money than brains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
