<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSDs Save Power &#8211; Right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/07/02/ssds-save-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/07/02/ssds-save-power/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/07/02/ssds-save-power/#comment-298079</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2698#comment-298079</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t really see many problems with their testing and wasn&#039;t that surprised by their results, hard drives have had decades of time spent making them more efficient and SSD haven&#039;t had nearly enough time, I think that SSD will be superior in the future but it may be a few years off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t really see many problems with their testing and wasn&#8217;t that surprised by their results, hard drives have had decades of time spent making them more efficient and SSD haven&#8217;t had nearly enough time, I think that SSD will be superior in the future but it may be a few years off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
