<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Beauty of Batches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/12/beauty-of-batches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/12/beauty-of-batches/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/12/beauty-of-batches/#comment-296917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2552#comment-296917</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using this method for years. I read once (can&#039;t remember where) to create &quot;mini-days&quot; in each of your days. Group similar tasks together in those &quot;mini-days&quot; and you&#039;ll get the whole of your work done much faster.

The explanation that was provided was that it &quot;reduced task overhead&quot; which makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using this method for years. I read once (can&#8217;t remember where) to create &#8220;mini-days&#8221; in each of your days. Group similar tasks together in those &#8220;mini-days&#8221; and you&#8217;ll get the whole of your work done much faster.</p>
<p>The explanation that was provided was that it &#8220;reduced task overhead&#8221; which makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/12/beauty-of-batches/#comment-296885</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2552#comment-296885</guid>
		<description>Thanks for picking this one up Mike - I think you make some good points about why it works so well. 

appreciate  you adding to the conversation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for picking this one up Mike &#8211; I think you make some good points about why it works so well. </p>
<p>appreciate  you adding to the conversation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deva Hazarika</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/12/beauty-of-batches/#comment-296872</link>
		<dc:creator>Deva Hazarika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2552#comment-296872</guid>
		<description>Very true, Mike.  The &quot;flow&quot; impacts often get lost when analyzing the more easily measurable productivity costs.  I posted about a few other good pieces on this topic that you may find interesting: http://www.emaildashboard.com/2008/06/interruptions-c.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true, Mike.  The &#8220;flow&#8221; impacts often get lost when analyzing the more easily measurable productivity costs.  I posted about a few other good pieces on this topic that you may find interesting: <a href="http://www.emaildashboard.com/2008/06/interruptions-c.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.emaildashboard.com/2008/06/interruptions-c.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Adkins</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/12/beauty-of-batches/#comment-296871</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Adkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2552#comment-296871</guid>
		<description>That is IT! I&#039;m always trying to set aside blocks of time to get stuff done, but still allow distractions- it&#039;s only when I hit the flow state that I really get anything done. I&#039;ve got to be more protective of that flow decent period- and it looks as if Batching is the way to go. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is IT! I&#8217;m always trying to set aside blocks of time to get stuff done, but still allow distractions- it&#8217;s only when I hit the flow state that I really get anything done. I&#8217;ve got to be more protective of that flow decent period- and it looks as if Batching is the way to go. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
