<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikia Goes Editable &#8211; Do You Trust It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/03/wikia-goes-editable-do-you-trust-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/03/wikia-goes-editable-do-you-trust-it/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Girard</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/03/wikia-goes-editable-do-you-trust-it/#comment-296154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Girard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2479#comment-296154</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t trust it yet, but once a couple of thousand people have searched for the same thing.... then I might.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What might be nice is a way to see how many people have rated a site, and when. This would let me tell the difference between the &quot;Best of the Year&quot; written in 2001 &amp; the one written last week, as well as knowing that 100 people think a site is the best for a topic, versus 800,000 thinking somewhere else is best.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t trust it yet, but once a couple of thousand people have searched for the same thing&#8230;. then I might.</p>

<p>What might be nice is a way to see how many people have rated a site, and when. This would let me tell the difference between the &#8220;Best of the Year&#8221; written in 2001 &amp; the one written last week, as well as knowing that 100 people think a site is the best for a topic, versus 800,000 thinking somewhere else is best.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edoardo Piccolotto</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/03/wikia-goes-editable-do-you-trust-it/#comment-296115</link>
		<dc:creator>Edoardo Piccolotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2479#comment-296115</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that is possible. There is the need of a community and of a system that help the community to do the job in an easier and faster way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is possible. There is the need of a community and of a system that help the community to do the job in an easier and faster way.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcin Grodzicki</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/06/03/wikia-goes-editable-do-you-trust-it/#comment-296093</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcin Grodzicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2479#comment-296093</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s virtually impossible to effectively do that on wikipedia - the editors will catch up on you quickly, so I guess the same can be true of wikia search. If they manage to pull in the same quality editors (which is very likely in my opinion) - they could swallow mahalo just like wikipedia slammed other online encyclopedias.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s virtually impossible to effectively do that on wikipedia &#8211; the editors will catch up on you quickly, so I guess the same can be true of wikia search. If they manage to pull in the same quality editors (which is very likely in my opinion) &#8211; they could swallow mahalo just like wikipedia slammed other online encyclopedias.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
