<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IETester Finds Rendering Errors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/31/ietester-finds-rendering-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/31/ietester-finds-rendering-errors/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin McNickle</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/31/ietester-finds-rendering-errors/#comment-303470</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin McNickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2461#comment-303470</guid>
		<description>@Blank Bellamy -- I used to be in the same school of thought, that this was just another gimmick that imitated IE. However, I gave it a go and tested it, the results of which can be seen here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whompbox.com/?p=13&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Test Results&lt;/a&gt;

IETester&#039;s rendering was identical to the original. (Taking different resolutions into account and the limitation of browsershots).

I&#039;m very happy with it and I have replaced all my virtual machines with one instance of IETester.

-- Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Blank Bellamy &#8212; I used to be in the same school of thought, that this was just another gimmick that imitated IE. However, I gave it a go and tested it, the results of which can be seen here: <a href="http://www.whompbox.com/?p=13" rel="nofollow">Test Results</a></p>
<p>IETester&#8217;s rendering was identical to the original. (Taking different resolutions into account and the limitation of browsershots).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very happy with it and I have replaced all my virtual machines with one instance of IETester.</p>
<p>&#8211; Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickMetz</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/31/ietester-finds-rendering-errors/#comment-298501</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickMetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2461#comment-298501</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using it for the last two weeks. Conclusion: Very nice and reliable tool. Except for the known bugs i could not find any differences between the rendering of the real browsers and IEtester. Two thumbs up :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using it for the last two weeks. Conclusion: Very nice and reliable tool. Except for the known bugs i could not find any differences between the rendering of the real browsers and IEtester. Two thumbs up :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bellamy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/31/ietester-finds-rendering-errors/#comment-296543</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bellamy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2461#comment-296543</guid>
		<description>NOTHING beats a dedicated install.  If you or your team are creating/working on websites and you don&#039;t have a separate machine just for testing IE then you fail.

And you need the original IE.  The one your users will be using.  Not some adulterated version tweaked for testing.

I&#039;m not knocking IEtester or netrender or whatever for casual use, but if you&#039;re a professional there is no excuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTHING beats a dedicated install.  If you or your team are creating/working on websites and you don&#8217;t have a separate machine just for testing IE then you fail.</p>
<p>And you need the original IE.  The one your users will be using.  Not some adulterated version tweaked for testing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not knocking IEtester or netrender or whatever for casual use, but if you&#8217;re a professional there is no excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/31/ietester-finds-rendering-errors/#comment-295986</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2461#comment-295986</guid>
		<description>A Mac version would be super swell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Mac version would be super swell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy Crawford</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/31/ietester-finds-rendering-errors/#comment-295966</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2461#comment-295966</guid>
		<description>Wow that is pretty sweet.  I can&#039;t stand testing old IE versions, and using browsershots or a VM is a pain.  This looks pretty promising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that is pretty sweet.  I can&#8217;t stand testing old IE versions, and using browsershots or a VM is a pain.  This looks pretty promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Murphy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/31/ietester-finds-rendering-errors/#comment-295913</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2461#comment-295913</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
