<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dreamweaver CS4 Hits Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/27/dreamweaver-cs4-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/27/dreamweaver-cs4-beta/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:35:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Agony</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/27/dreamweaver-cs4-beta/#comment-297647</link>
		<dc:creator>Agony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2429#comment-297647</guid>
		<description>&quot;Seriously now … what are the chances this upcoming version of Dreamweaver is any good? Are there people that actually still use it? Really?&quot;

Are there people that don&#039;t?  Dreamweaver is the #1 development tool utilized by web developers above any other.  Maybe YOUR method of coding/designing is obscure, or maybe you just don&#039;t have the necessary skill-set to utilize the application to make it work for you.  I just don&#039;t see how anyone on a professional level would think that hard-coding functions and scripts is efficient.  Not efficient in accuracy, but in-efficient from a project life cycle perspective.  

&quot;The current version is a steaming piece of crap… I still have to go back and fire up Version 8 when it hangs up and bombs out. ugh.&quot;

You should probably install a legit version on your system first, and then see if the issues cease.  If you do have a legit install, then contact support.  After all, you are entitled to support by proxy of purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Seriously now … what are the chances this upcoming version of Dreamweaver is any good? Are there people that actually still use it? Really?&#8221;</p>
<p>Are there people that don&#8217;t?  Dreamweaver is the #1 development tool utilized by web developers above any other.  Maybe YOUR method of coding/designing is obscure, or maybe you just don&#8217;t have the necessary skill-set to utilize the application to make it work for you.  I just don&#8217;t see how anyone on a professional level would think that hard-coding functions and scripts is efficient.  Not efficient in accuracy, but in-efficient from a project life cycle perspective.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The current version is a steaming piece of crap… I still have to go back and fire up Version 8 when it hangs up and bombs out. ugh.&#8221;</p>
<p>You should probably install a legit version on your system first, and then see if the issues cease.  If you do have a legit install, then contact support.  After all, you are entitled to support by proxy of purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/27/dreamweaver-cs4-beta/#comment-295665</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2429#comment-295665</guid>
		<description>Bill I&#039;ve found Textmate to be a dream when coding sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill I&#8217;ve found Textmate to be a dream when coding sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bennett</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/27/dreamweaver-cs4-beta/#comment-295649</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2429#comment-295649</guid>
		<description>What viable alternatives are there? I find Dreamweaver is overkill. On the other hand I haven&#039;t found a decent low-joule non-wysiwyg html editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What viable alternatives are there? I find Dreamweaver is overkill. On the other hand I haven&#8217;t found a decent low-joule non-wysiwyg html editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usedwigs</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/27/dreamweaver-cs4-beta/#comment-295628</link>
		<dc:creator>usedwigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2429#comment-295628</guid>
		<description>Sadly, many people still need to use it for many projects, like me. The current version is a steaming piece of crap... I still have to go back and fire up Version 8 when it hangs up and bombs out. ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, many people still need to use it for many projects, like me. The current version is a steaming piece of crap&#8230; I still have to go back and fire up Version 8 when it hangs up and bombs out. ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/27/dreamweaver-cs4-beta/#comment-295585</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2429#comment-295585</guid>
		<description>Seriously now ... what are the chances this upcoming version of Dreamweaver is any good?  Are there people that actually still use it? Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously now &#8230; what are the chances this upcoming version of Dreamweaver is any good?  Are there people that actually still use it? Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
