<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hope for Air Travelers with Laptops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: geniusthemaster</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295883</link>
		<dc:creator>geniusthemaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295883</guid>
		<description>this a big PHREAKING reason there not made to be xray proof, uv and xray wipes out the bios chip on at least 65 % of all labtops; they have a little bios flash area underneath the label of the bios chips on those 65% so to make it easy for manufactures to fix the computer. in other words, you go through the airport and wonder why you dont even get the blackscreen later. i DO hope they consider this when they sell them or theres going to be a recall worse then the firestone tires incident. (3 million dollars i believe?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this a big PHREAKING reason there not made to be xray proof, uv and xray wipes out the bios chip on at least 65 % of all labtops; they have a little bios flash area underneath the label of the bios chips on those 65% so to make it easy for manufactures to fix the computer. in other words, you go through the airport and wonder why you dont even get the blackscreen later. i DO hope they consider this when they sell them or theres going to be a recall worse then the firestone tires incident. (3 million dollars i believe?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295637</guid>
		<description>So as long as you only have a laptop in this new TSA approved bag, then you wont have to take out your laptop..

Its called a plastic bag. 

Like @Roland said.. what about my charger? My external HDD? my USB leads? 

If I have to open the bag an lay it out, why not just pull the laptop out? Sorry I don&#039;t see the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as long as you only have a laptop in this new TSA approved bag, then you wont have to take out your laptop..</p>
<p>Its called a plastic bag. </p>
<p>Like @Roland said.. what about my charger? My external HDD? my USB leads? </p>
<p>If I have to open the bag an lay it out, why not just pull the laptop out? Sorry I don&#8217;t see the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295495</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295495</guid>
		<description>Its not only the security checkpoints that are so bad in the US.  Its passing through immigration.  Super slow inefficient and a downright pain.  Not to mention the visa officers like to chat up passengers.  What a joke.  Going through the Heathrow was 1000x better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not only the security checkpoints that are so bad in the US.  Its passing through immigration.  Super slow inefficient and a downright pain.  Not to mention the visa officers like to chat up passengers.  What a joke.  Going through the Heathrow was 1000x better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295494</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295494</guid>
		<description>Dear,

I recently travelled via Heathrow Terminal one and I can confirm that we can now pass through the security without taking the laptop out of the bag.

Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear,</p>
<p>I recently travelled via Heathrow Terminal one and I can confirm that we can now pass through the security without taking the laptop out of the bag.</p>
<p>Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gunderloy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295458</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gunderloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295458</guid>
		<description>@Roland - I&#039;ve seen that critique, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s valid. If you look at the original coverage, it says that many of the proposed designs have two sides, one that holds the laptop and one that holds the detritus. Then you&#039;d open - but not unpack - your bag to send it through the scanner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roland &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen that critique, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s valid. If you look at the original coverage, it says that many of the proposed designs have two sides, one that holds the laptop and one that holds the detritus. Then you&#8217;d open &#8211; but not unpack &#8211; your bag to send it through the scanner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Dobbins</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295457</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Dobbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295457</guid>
		<description>Since these new designs preclude carrying chargers, cables, extra batteries, and the other necessities of traveling with a laptopo, they&#039;re useless, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since these new designs preclude carrying chargers, cables, extra batteries, and the other necessities of traveling with a laptopo, they&#8217;re useless, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Roddis</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295446</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Roddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295446</guid>
		<description>This this really needed?

Most cases are already fine for the Xray machines. The reason given in the past was that the laptop itself blocked what was below it in the xray machine and that was the reason for removing it.

Indeed in Heathrow they have now installed xray machines that scan from the tops and the sides so this is no longer a problem. So if you now fly out of Heathrow (not just T5) you don&#039;t have to take your laptop out of your suitcase (which is good news as you still have to bag up your liquids and take off your shoes and belt.

This sounds like a marketing solution for a problem that doesn&#039;t really exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This this really needed?</p>
<p>Most cases are already fine for the Xray machines. The reason given in the past was that the laptop itself blocked what was below it in the xray machine and that was the reason for removing it.</p>
<p>Indeed in Heathrow they have now installed xray machines that scan from the tops and the sides so this is no longer a problem. So if you now fly out of Heathrow (not just T5) you don&#8217;t have to take your laptop out of your suitcase (which is good news as you still have to bag up your liquids and take off your shoes and belt.</p>
<p>This sounds like a marketing solution for a problem that doesn&#8217;t really exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gunderloy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295434</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gunderloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295434</guid>
		<description>No announced prices yet, as far as I know. We should see some by late summer, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No announced prices yet, as far as I know. We should see some by late summer, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Spencer</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/24/hope-for-air-travelers-with-laptops/#comment-295419</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=2423#comment-295419</guid>
		<description>Interesting.

Do you have any word on how much these cost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>Do you have any word on how much these cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
