<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upgrading to 802.11n Wi-Fi: Easier Than Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/12/upgrading-to-80211n-wi-fi-easier-than-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/12/upgrading-to-80211n-wi-fi-easier-than-ever/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lawrencesalberg</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/12/upgrading-to-80211n-wi-fi-easier-than-ever/#comment-294901</link>
		<dc:creator>lawrencesalberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2331#comment-294901</guid>
		<description>This is misleading. &quot;There are numerous reasons to upgrade&quot; you say in the opening paragraph. Then, you fail to give any.

But, instead we get a hodge-podge collection of products and associated links. Are these paid links? Be honest.

The fact is, like Brian said above, that for most people an upgrade is useless. Let&#039;s see... my current G network speed is 54 Megabits per second. My broadband internet connection? 8 Mb/s. 

It&#039;s only useful for connecting to other machines - and only for large and relatively consistent file xfers. Like gamefile .exe&#039;s, DVD&#039;s, streaming music, etc. The once-a-week xfer of a Word doc or a even copying a subdirectory over and G (and even 802.11b) is more than adequate. 

Not sure why these kinds of things are considered posts. I seem to be seeing more of this stuff on otherwise good blogs.

Hey, I&#039;m happy to read the blog (for free) so maybe I shouldn&#039;t complain. I just think a little more effort should be put into posts. Even though your blog is targeted at web workers who, we assume, know enough to know this stuff, you and I both know that you&#039;ll be getting a lot of outside traffic to various deep links on the site. You&#039;d think being responsible to those visitors would require a little bit more meat and potatoes, and less product placement links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is misleading. &#8220;There are numerous reasons to upgrade&#8221; you say in the opening paragraph. Then, you fail to give any.</p>
<p>But, instead we get a hodge-podge collection of products and associated links. Are these paid links? Be honest.</p>
<p>The fact is, like Brian said above, that for most people an upgrade is useless. Let&#8217;s see&#8230; my current G network speed is 54 Megabits per second. My broadband internet connection? 8 Mb/s. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s only useful for connecting to other machines &#8211; and only for large and relatively consistent file xfers. Like gamefile .exe&#8217;s, DVD&#8217;s, streaming music, etc. The once-a-week xfer of a Word doc or a even copying a subdirectory over and G (and even 802.11b) is more than adequate. </p>
<p>Not sure why these kinds of things are considered posts. I seem to be seeing more of this stuff on otherwise good blogs.</p>
<p>Hey, I&#8217;m happy to read the blog (for free) so maybe I shouldn&#8217;t complain. I just think a little more effort should be put into posts. Even though your blog is targeted at web workers who, we assume, know enough to know this stuff, you and I both know that you&#8217;ll be getting a lot of outside traffic to various deep links on the site. You&#8217;d think being responsible to those visitors would require a little bit more meat and potatoes, and less product placement links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/05/12/upgrading-to-80211n-wi-fi-easier-than-ever/#comment-294856</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2331#comment-294856</guid>
		<description>I upgraded my router and adapters to wireless N several months ago and have been very happy, but it&#039;s not necessarily for everyone.

Specifically, it&#039;s great if you&#039;re doing any sort of networking between computers in your house. I&#039;ve got a multi-terabyte server in the basement, and wireless N means file transfers/streaming from the server to the clients in my house happen much faster.

However, a lot of people I know use their wireless for nothing more than distributing Internet access to different computers. In that case, wireless N is a very expensive upgrade for very little improvement over 802.11g.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded my router and adapters to wireless N several months ago and have been very happy, but it&#8217;s not necessarily for everyone.</p>
<p>Specifically, it&#8217;s great if you&#8217;re doing any sort of networking between computers in your house. I&#8217;ve got a multi-terabyte server in the basement, and wireless N means file transfers/streaming from the server to the clients in my house happen much faster.</p>
<p>However, a lot of people I know use their wireless for nothing more than distributing Internet access to different computers. In that case, wireless N is a very expensive upgrade for very little improvement over 802.11g.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
