<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AideRSS Integrates with Google Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/04/01/aiderss-integrates-google-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/04/01/aiderss-integrates-google-reader/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/04/01/aiderss-integrates-google-reader/#comment-290477</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1997#comment-290477</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of this and I look forward to testing it out further.  Thanks for the invite!

My first impression had me thinking it&#039;s a shame that aggregates such as &quot;Starred Items&quot; don&#039;t load up PostRanks.  I initially read most posts when they are newly added, so the PostRank is going to be low as a matter of course.

But it seems a good research tool in general.  And certainly worthwhile when analysing what&#039;s popular to the &#039;wise crowd&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of this and I look forward to testing it out further.  Thanks for the invite!</p>
<p>My first impression had me thinking it&#8217;s a shame that aggregates such as &#8220;Starred Items&#8221; don&#8217;t load up PostRanks.  I initially read most posts when they are newly added, so the PostRank is going to be low as a matter of course.</p>
<p>But it seems a good research tool in general.  And certainly worthwhile when analysing what&#8217;s popular to the &#8216;wise crowd&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
