<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FuseCal Wants to Be One Calendar to Rule Them All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/28/fusecal-wants-to-be-one-calendar-to-rule-them-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/28/fusecal-wants-to-be-one-calendar-to-rule-them-all/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Web Work 101: 10 Apps You Can&#8217;t Do Without &#171;</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/28/fusecal-wants-to-be-one-calendar-to-rule-them-all/#comment-312622</link>
		<dc:creator>WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Web Work 101: 10 Apps You Can&#8217;t Do Without &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1977#comment-312622</guid>
		<description>[...] FuseCal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FuseCal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schilke</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/28/fusecal-wants-to-be-one-calendar-to-rule-them-all/#comment-290460</link>
		<dc:creator>schilke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1977#comment-290460</guid>
		<description>hmm, regarding the detection of events on web pages: haven&#039;t seen that before and it might be either useful and revolutionary - the other features are not really new as Google Calendar already offers them since the beginning...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, regarding the detection of events on web pages: haven&#8217;t seen that before and it might be either useful and revolutionary &#8211; the other features are not really new as Google Calendar already offers them since the beginning&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Gillooly [FuseCal.com]</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/28/fusecal-wants-to-be-one-calendar-to-rule-them-all/#comment-290442</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Gillooly [FuseCal.com]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1977#comment-290442</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post, Jason!

One thing that&#039;s been a little glossed over is FuseCal&#039;s information extraction technology.  We consider it our core feature...  FuseCal understands the calendar events in (ideally) any website... not just iCal-based calendars.  To my knowledge, there&#039;s no one else doing quite that.

Anyways, I&#039;m glad you find us useful.  Drop me a line through our feedback form if you have any more thoughts on how we can make FuseCal even better.

cheers,
Matt Gillooly
Product Manager, FuseCal.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, Jason!</p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s been a little glossed over is FuseCal&#8217;s information extraction technology.  We consider it our core feature&#8230;  FuseCal understands the calendar events in (ideally) any website&#8230; not just iCal-based calendars.  To my knowledge, there&#8217;s no one else doing quite that.</p>
<p>Anyways, I&#8217;m glad you find us useful.  Drop me a line through our feedback form if you have any more thoughts on how we can make FuseCal even better.</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
Matt Gillooly<br />
Product Manager, FuseCal.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTD Power Links &#171; Geeks Guide To Getting Things Done</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/28/fusecal-wants-to-be-one-calendar-to-rule-them-all/#comment-290418</link>
		<dc:creator>GTD Power Links &#171; Geeks Guide To Getting Things Done</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1977#comment-290418</guid>
		<description>[...] Yet another online calendar that promises to solve all of lifes problems&#8230;FuseCal, a new web application, allows you to combine multiple calendars and create one master calendar. Ideally, this means you can take any iCal calendar such as Outlook 2003/2007, Google Calendar, Apple’s iCal, and Yahoo! Calendar and add them into FuseCal, granting you new functionality. (via web worker daily) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yet another online calendar that promises to solve all of lifes problems&#8230;FuseCal, a new web application, allows you to combine multiple calendars and create one master calendar. Ideally, this means you can take any iCal calendar such as Outlook 2003/2007, Google Calendar, Apple’s iCal, and Yahoo! Calendar and add them into FuseCal, granting you new functionality. (via web worker daily) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/28/fusecal-wants-to-be-one-calendar-to-rule-them-all/#comment-290270</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1977#comment-290270</guid>
		<description>I was a bit confused by the wording of what Fusecal offers.  Advertising &quot;sync&quot; between calendars to me seems like a two-way synchronization such as what Plaxo offers.  Fusecal will be a great way to aggregate and filter multiple calendars, but technically it doesn&#039;t &quot;sync&quot; them (yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a bit confused by the wording of what Fusecal offers.  Advertising &#8220;sync&#8221; between calendars to me seems like a two-way synchronization such as what Plaxo offers.  Fusecal will be a great way to aggregate and filter multiple calendars, but technically it doesn&#8217;t &#8220;sync&#8221; them (yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey Eschright</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/28/fusecal-wants-to-be-one-calendar-to-rule-them-all/#comment-290259</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey Eschright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1977#comment-290259</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an install-it-yourself Rails app, not a service, but this basically what I&#039;ve been working on with Calagator (http://calagator.org). We&#039;re approaching things from the POV of a community that needs to integrate calendars from different sub-groups, but the features end up the same: import, collate, filter, and export. I&#039;m interested in talking to people who&#039;d like to try it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an install-it-yourself Rails app, not a service, but this basically what I&#8217;ve been working on with Calagator (<a href="http://calagator.org" rel="nofollow">http://calagator.org</a>). We&#8217;re approaching things from the POV of a community that needs to integrate calendars from different sub-groups, but the features end up the same: import, collate, filter, and export. I&#8217;m interested in talking to people who&#8217;d like to try it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
