<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Improves Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/11/firefox-3-improves-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/11/firefox-3-improves-again/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gunderloy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/11/firefox-3-improves-again/#comment-289509</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gunderloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1893#comment-289509</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m finding performance to be better, and memory use lower, than it was in Firefox 2. There are so many variables, though, that you&#039;ll have to see how it stacks up with your own usage patterns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finding performance to be better, and memory use lower, than it was in Firefox 2. There are so many variables, though, that you&#8217;ll have to see how it stacks up with your own usage patterns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/11/firefox-3-improves-again/#comment-289506</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1893#comment-289506</guid>
		<description>I wonder if firebug will run better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if firebug will run better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Haven</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/11/firefox-3-improves-again/#comment-289504</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Haven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1893#comment-289504</guid>
		<description>How does its performance and memory use compare to Firefox 2 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does its performance and memory use compare to Firefox 2 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawn</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/03/11/firefox-3-improves-again/#comment-289493</link>
		<dc:creator>dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=1893#comment-289493</guid>
		<description>The new beta does look awfully nice but it about breaks my heart to lose greader. Can&#039;t wait &#039;til it catches up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new beta does look awfully nice but it about breaks my heart to lose greader. Can&#8217;t wait &#8217;til it catches up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
