<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype releases 2.7 for the Mac, Continues to Improve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/14/skype-releases-27-for-the-mac-continues-to-improve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/14/skype-releases-27-for-the-mac-continues-to-improve/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:04:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandi Jull</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/14/skype-releases-27-for-the-mac-continues-to-improve/#comment-290443</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Jull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1758#comment-290443</guid>
		<description>but that still doesn&#039;t answer the question: how can someone using a Mac prevent Skype acting as a supernode? Yes, yes, yes, behind a firewall, using a NAT, all wonderful. But the PC has a registry setting that can be modified. What about a preference or setting that can be modified on OS X.(whatever) to prevent the potential of being a supernode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but that still doesn&#8217;t answer the question: how can someone using a Mac prevent Skype acting as a supernode? Yes, yes, yes, behind a firewall, using a NAT, all wonderful. But the PC has a registry setting that can be modified. What about a preference or setting that can be modified on OS X.(whatever) to prevent the potential of being a supernode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gunderloy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/14/skype-releases-27-for-the-mac-continues-to-improve/#comment-287947</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gunderloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1758#comment-287947</guid>
		<description>Explicit statement from Skype on things that prevent becoming a supernode: http://www.skype.com/security/universities/ . Being behind a NAT or using HTTP or SOCKS5 proxy will prevent you from becoming a supernode. The registry setting is mentioned as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explicit statement from Skype on things that prevent becoming a supernode: <a href="http://www.skype.com/security/universities/" rel="nofollow">http://www.skype.com/security/universities/</a> . Being behind a NAT or using HTTP or SOCKS5 proxy will prevent you from becoming a supernode. The registry setting is mentioned as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.A. Watson</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/14/skype-releases-27-for-the-mac-continues-to-improve/#comment-287944</link>
		<dc:creator>J.A. Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1758#comment-287944</guid>
		<description>The propagation of &quot;to my knowledge&quot; information about Skype, rather than REAL answers, is part of the problem today - and part of the reason that they are still able to prosper despite all of their problems.  Yes, your computer can be made a Skype &quot;supernode&quot; without your knowledge or permission, and no one at Skype has even been willing to give a clear answer as to how you can unconditionally prevent that - all you ever get is &quot;it *shouldn&#039;t happen if you do this&quot;.

Further, the entire &quot;supernode&quot; structure is one of the major reasons that Skype &quot;Presence Reporting&quot; is unreliable and typically incorrect.  As has been said even in the Skype Journal, &quot;IM without Presence Reporting is nothing&quot; - having the ability to video call, talk, chat, whatever without knowing reliably when your contacts are present is tedious at best, and downright maddening most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The propagation of &#8220;to my knowledge&#8221; information about Skype, rather than REAL answers, is part of the problem today &#8211; and part of the reason that they are still able to prosper despite all of their problems.  Yes, your computer can be made a Skype &#8220;supernode&#8221; without your knowledge or permission, and no one at Skype has even been willing to give a clear answer as to how you can unconditionally prevent that &#8211; all you ever get is &#8220;it *shouldn&#8217;t happen if you do this&#8221;.</p>
<p>Further, the entire &#8220;supernode&#8221; structure is one of the major reasons that Skype &#8220;Presence Reporting&#8221; is unreliable and typically incorrect.  As has been said even in the Skype Journal, &#8220;IM without Presence Reporting is nothing&#8221; &#8211; having the ability to video call, talk, chat, whatever without knowing reliably when your contacts are present is tedious at best, and downright maddening most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Harris</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/14/skype-releases-27-for-the-mac-continues-to-improve/#comment-287939</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1758#comment-287939</guid>
		<description>Tom,

To my knowledge, you can only become a Skype supernode if you&#039;re running Skype on a computer that is not behind a firewall.  

Also, Windows computers can set a registry setting to further prevent themselves from becoming a Skype supernode.

Check out this site for more info:
https://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/view/CF/SkypeConfiguration</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>To my knowledge, you can only become a Skype supernode if you&#8217;re running Skype on a computer that is not behind a firewall.  </p>
<p>Also, Windows computers can set a registry setting to further prevent themselves from becoming a Skype supernode.</p>
<p>Check out this site for more info:<br />
<a href="https://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/view/CF/SkypeConfiguration" rel="nofollow">https://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/view/CF/SkypeConfiguration</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Moberg</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/14/skype-releases-27-for-the-mac-continues-to-improve/#comment-287936</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Moberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1758#comment-287936</guid>
		<description>Does anyone still worry about the whole supernode issue with Skype? I still don&#039;t recommend Skype to clients because of the (earlier) issues with Skype taking over your computer and making it part of the Skype broadcast network. Should I still be concerned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone still worry about the whole supernode issue with Skype? I still don&#8217;t recommend Skype to clients because of the (earlier) issues with Skype taking over your computer and making it part of the Skype broadcast network. Should I still be concerned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
