<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starbucks Ditching T-Mobile, Adopting AT&amp;T for Hotspots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive Starbucks Starts Wi-Fi Debates, Breakfast Battles Heat Up &#171;</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287985</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive Starbucks Starts Wi-Fi Debates, Breakfast Battles Heat Up &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287985</guid>
		<description>[...] 15th, 2008 (8:57am) Jason Harris No Comments All the news this week about Starbucks changing wi-fi service providers and offering anyone with a Starbucks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 15th, 2008 (8:57am) Jason Harris No Comments All the news this week about Starbucks changing wi-fi service providers and offering anyone with a Starbucks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunch Time Links for 2-14-08 &#124; Smart Pastor</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287942</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunch Time Links for 2-14-08 &#124; Smart Pastor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287942</guid>
		<description>[...] Starbucks is going to start providing free (well, there is a small catch) wireless internet service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Starbucks is going to start providing free (well, there is a small catch) wireless internet service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287905</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287905</guid>
		<description>Cool. Now ATT can violate the federal wiretapping laws and report to the  government anything you do from Starbucks, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Now ATT can violate the federal wiretapping laws and report to the  government anything you do from Starbucks, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermaine M</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287820</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermaine M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287820</guid>
		<description>Just when I was looking at dropping AT&amp;T DSL this news comes out. Guess AT&amp;T will keep me as a DSL customer after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I was looking at dropping AT&amp;T DSL this news comes out. Guess AT&amp;T will keep me as a DSL customer after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coldhitz</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287818</link>
		<dc:creator>Coldhitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287818</guid>
		<description>I just moved and my new neighborehood is only serviced by AT&amp;T. They did not tell me I would only be able to have the basic speed as my fastest speed option. am with T-mobil and pretty happy , but this new deal with Starbucks has me looking at making a change with my T-Mobile contract coming up to expire. If AT&amp;T wireless will start offering a better airtime for the money deal , I would switch  , so that I coud bundle my services , and save some sweet coin. Good article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just moved and my new neighborehood is only serviced by AT&amp;T. They did not tell me I would only be able to have the basic speed as my fastest speed option. am with T-mobil and pretty happy , but this new deal with Starbucks has me looking at making a change with my T-Mobile contract coming up to expire. If AT&amp;T wireless will start offering a better airtime for the money deal , I would switch  , so that I coud bundle my services , and save some sweet coin. Good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287817</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287817</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  But what about the poor shmucks who aren&#039;t T-Mobile customers, but signed that yearly contract for $29.99 a month to access HotSpot services.  What happens to them?  Will T-Mobile still expect them to pay $29.99 per month for a service that AT&amp;T is offering (ostensibly) for free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  But what about the poor shmucks who aren&#8217;t T-Mobile customers, but signed that yearly contract for $29.99 a month to access HotSpot services.  What happens to them?  Will T-Mobile still expect them to pay $29.99 per month for a service that AT&amp;T is offering (ostensibly) for free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starbucks Wifi Shakeup &#124; TheJobBored</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287810</link>
		<dc:creator>Starbucks Wifi Shakeup &#124; TheJobBored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287810</guid>
		<description>[...] h/t WebWorkerDaily  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] h/t WebWorkerDaily  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kalsey</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287805</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kalsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287805</guid>
		<description>AT&amp;T&#039;s wifi is only free for their business class DSL customers at the top tiers of service. If you&#039;re a residential subscriber or use the entry-level business packages, you can add unlimited wifi for $2 per month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s wifi is only free for their business class DSL customers at the top tiers of service. If you&#8217;re a residential subscriber or use the entry-level business packages, you can add unlimited wifi for $2 per month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287804</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287804</guid>
		<description>AT&amp;T? Sounds like this might be related to Starbucks partnerships with Apple. Free wifi for iphone/itouch users coming soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T? Sounds like this might be related to Starbucks partnerships with Apple. Free wifi for iphone/itouch users coming soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Harris</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287803</guid>
		<description>Hey Kevin..thanks for commenting.  I never said in my post that T-Mobile users were out in the cold, I just stated that Starbucks has switched to AT&amp;T for their wi-fi hotspot service provider.

However, to avoid confusion, I added an update to the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin..thanks for commenting.  I never said in my post that T-Mobile users were out in the cold, I just stated that Starbucks has switched to AT&amp;T for their wi-fi hotspot service provider.</p>
<p>However, to avoid confusion, I added an update to the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287802</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287802</guid>
		<description>Jason, they didn&#039;t ditch T-Mo, they&#039;re still keeping that service for T-Mo customers with a special arrangement between T-Mo and AT&amp;T.: http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=826</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, they didn&#8217;t ditch T-Mo, they&#8217;re still keeping that service for T-Mo customers with a special arrangement between T-Mo and AT&amp;T.: <a href="http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=826" rel="nofollow">http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=826</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starbucks Breaks Up with T-Mobile, Hooks up with AT&#38;T - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/02/11/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-287801</link>
		<dc:creator>Starbucks Breaks Up with T-Mobile, Hooks up with AT&#38;T - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-287801</guid>
		<description>[...] going to work, or are you going to get shafted. I would be mighty mad if my plan stops working. Continue Reading @ WebWorkerDaily     Share/Send  Sphere  Print  Previous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to work, or are you going to get shafted. I would be mighty mad if my plan stops working. Continue Reading @ WebWorkerDaily     Share/Send  Sphere  Print  Previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
