<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning-After Reaction to MacBook Air: G4 Cube Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: My Eee PC is greater than your Macbook Air. - Nate Tenczars Blog</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-313119</link>
		<dc:creator>My Eee PC is greater than your Macbook Air. - Nate Tenczars Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-313119</guid>
		<description>[...] underpowered specs, this Macbook is a clear flop by Apple. As I read in the comments of a website page once, &#8220;Coolest thing about the AIR: When all the downsides finally drive you insane, you can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] underpowered specs, this Macbook is a clear flop by Apple. As I read in the comments of a website page once, &#8220;Coolest thing about the AIR: When all the downsides finally drive you insane, you can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive SSDs Save Power - Right? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-298045</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive SSDs Save Power - Right? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-298045</guid>
		<description>[...] 2008 (11:00am) Mike Gunderloy No Comments  One of the eye-catching things about the MacBook Air announcement was the availability of a solid-state drive (SSD) as a standard option, replacing the mechanical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008 (11:00am) Mike Gunderloy No Comments  One of the eye-catching things about the MacBook Air announcement was the availability of a solid-state drive (SSD) as a standard option, replacing the mechanical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-289914</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-289914</guid>
		<description>Does it Levitate?

Does it cause a craving for mustard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it Levitate?</p>
<p>Does it cause a craving for mustard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive The Shrinking Computer and the Web Worker &#171;</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-287020</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive The Shrinking Computer and the Web Worker &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-287020</guid>
		<description>[...] just don&#8217;t cut the mustard for me (I&#8217;m on the side of those who find the Air to be too much of a compromise). This opens the question, though: what am I waiting for?  If I think about my dream portable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just don&#8217;t cut the mustard for me (I&#8217;m on the side of those who find the Air to be too much of a compromise). This opens the question, though: what am I waiting for?  If I think about my dream portable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dH</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-286677</link>
		<dc:creator>dH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-286677</guid>
		<description>Does anybody has noticed the MONO speaker? Yes, Macbook Air has only ONE, MONO speaker. Very sad. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody has noticed the MONO speaker? Yes, Macbook Air has only ONE, MONO speaker. Very sad. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heavily Caffeinated &#8211; The Cube</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-286667</link>
		<dc:creator>Heavily Caffeinated &#8211; The Cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-286667</guid>
		<description>[...] Prediction of sales numbers - when all is said and done, the MacBook Air will sell in numbers FAR closer to the 17-inch MacBook Pro than it will to the 15-incher or to the 13-inch MacBook. Such is the fate of niche products. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prediction of sales numbers &#8211; when all is said and done, the MacBook Air will sell in numbers FAR closer to the 17-inch MacBook Pro than it will to the 15-incher or to the 13-inch MacBook. Such is the fate of niche products. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechTips</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285840</link>
		<dc:creator>TechTips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285840</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s new motto: Making already extremely expensive technology even easier to break. I&#039;d be afraid I would lose it in between the ream of paper in my printer and end up printing out a beef stroganoff recipe on it. Seriously, I love small, thin, and light gagets, but only those I can afford to break if I look at it wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s new motto: Making already extremely expensive technology even easier to break. I&#8217;d be afraid I would lose it in between the ream of paper in my printer and end up printing out a beef stroganoff recipe on it. Seriously, I love small, thin, and light gagets, but only those I can afford to break if I look at it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Moore</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285768</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285768</guid>
		<description>In response to people who say that the 5-pound MacBooks should be light enough: When I bought my 3.8-pound Sharp, I passed up the MacBooks precisely because of their weight. I had a 6-pound laptop at the time and after several hours of walking with that thing I hated it. 

Here&#039;s how it goes: You walk a mile or so to the metro. You stand on the platform waiting, then stand on the train for 20 minutes, then climb the stairs and walk another half mile or more. Then your next destination for the day is another walk, metro ride (hey, maybe you&#039;ll get a seat this time!), more stairs, and another walk. And then there&#039;s the trip home. Of course, you&#039;re carrying a book and maybe other stuff as well, and you&#039;re doing this every day. A 2-pound difference in laptop weight is a big difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to people who say that the 5-pound MacBooks should be light enough: When I bought my 3.8-pound Sharp, I passed up the MacBooks precisely because of their weight. I had a 6-pound laptop at the time and after several hours of walking with that thing I hated it. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it goes: You walk a mile or so to the metro. You stand on the platform waiting, then stand on the train for 20 minutes, then climb the stairs and walk another half mile or more. Then your next destination for the day is another walk, metro ride (hey, maybe you&#8217;ll get a seat this time!), more stairs, and another walk. And then there&#8217;s the trip home. Of course, you&#8217;re carrying a book and maybe other stuff as well, and you&#8217;re doing this every day. A 2-pound difference in laptop weight is a big difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schwuk.com</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285762</link>
		<dc:creator>schwuk.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285762</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Letting the air out of Air&lt;/strong&gt;

Unless you have been living under a rock for the past 24-odd hours, you will have heard about the new Macbook Air ultra-slim laptop from Apple. Since everyone else is talking about it, I thought I would join in the fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Letting the air out of Air</strong></p>
<p>Unless you have been living under a rock for the past 24-odd hours, you will have heard about the new Macbook Air ultra-slim laptop from Apple. Since everyone else is talking about it, I thought I would join in the fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Martelli</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285754</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Martelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285754</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve ordered my MBA yesterday (entry-level: I decided I wouldn&#039;t get sufficient benefits from faster CPU or SSD to justify their prices), mostly because it&#039;s the _lightest_ machine I can buy to use Keynote on (other local apps are nice but I could get roughly equivalent ones for a Linux ultralight, but Keynote is the killer app for me, as IMHO it is for anybody whose career may live or die based on their presentations).  My Asus eee serves me decently well (though 7&quot; is really too little screen -- somewhere around 11&quot; might be the best compromise), but Impress and other presentation apps for it just can&#039;t cut the mustard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve ordered my MBA yesterday (entry-level: I decided I wouldn&#8217;t get sufficient benefits from faster CPU or SSD to justify their prices), mostly because it&#8217;s the _lightest_ machine I can buy to use Keynote on (other local apps are nice but I could get roughly equivalent ones for a Linux ultralight, but Keynote is the killer app for me, as IMHO it is for anybody whose career may live or die based on their presentations).  My Asus eee serves me decently well (though 7&#8243; is really too little screen &#8212; somewhere around 11&#8243; might be the best compromise), but Impress and other presentation apps for it just can&#8217;t cut the mustard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Oblak - MacBigot.com</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285734</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Oblak - MacBigot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285734</guid>
		<description>OK, first Apple got the world to ignore the handful of really well-implemented UMPC products out there (did you even KNOW that there are &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/15/hands-on-with-digital-cubes-worlds-smallest-umpc-the-g43/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;full-blown Windows PCs to be had for under $1000&lt;/A&gt; that are nearly the size of the iPhone?)... not long after convincing users on the cheap that their 12&quot; Powerbooks and iBooks just weren&#039;t, well, LARGE enough...

Enter the Apple MacBook (hot)Air.  I was hoping for a return to smaller (not thinner).  Smaller would have meant more portability, more computing availability (how many users NOW have their MacBooks or MacBook Pros with them ALL THE TIME?), more customers, more face-time with potential Mac fans among the unwashen Windows heathen, and perhaps trading in only a few pixels in screen real-estate to pull it off.  Instead, we got an overpriced &#039;concept car&#039; with the safety glass traded in for non-functional style.

Yes, I said it, &lt;STRONG&gt;non-functional style&lt;/STRONG&gt;.  What about it is &#039;non-functional&#039;, you ask?  Let me turn that around to you with another question:  &lt;STRONG&gt;What do you get for your &#039;Air&#039; money that you don&#039;t get for much less cash in the form of a current MacBook?  That&#039;s right -- NOTHING.&lt;/STRONG&gt;

If Apple wanted something truly marketable to their real audience (not the 6-figure executives who will be toting this &#039;Queer Eye for a Straight OS&#039; Wilma-Deering-wanna-be), they would have rolled us a 10-inch diagonal screen with 1024x768 pixels, longer battery life than the &#039;standard&#039; MacBooks, an external &#039;Air&#039;-like optical drive, and a full complement of ports that don&#039;t make me have to search around to figure out which Mag-Safe cord goes to which Mag-Safe computer.

I want something halfway between the current MacBook and the now-infamous &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.OQO.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OQO&lt;/A&gt;.  If Apple isn&#039;t going to be the one to deliver it to us, then I may end up tired enough to go try seeing what the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.linspire.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Linspire&lt;/A&gt; folks have in the way of an Adobe Illustrator clone in their C-N-R (Click-N-Run) library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, first Apple got the world to ignore the handful of really well-implemented UMPC products out there (did you even KNOW that there are <a HREF="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/15/hands-on-with-digital-cubes-worlds-smallest-umpc-the-g43/" rel="nofollow">full-blown Windows PCs to be had for under $1000</a> that are nearly the size of the iPhone?)&#8230; not long after convincing users on the cheap that their 12&#8243; Powerbooks and iBooks just weren&#8217;t, well, LARGE enough&#8230;</p>
<p>Enter the Apple MacBook (hot)Air.  I was hoping for a return to smaller (not thinner).  Smaller would have meant more portability, more computing availability (how many users NOW have their MacBooks or MacBook Pros with them ALL THE TIME?), more customers, more face-time with potential Mac fans among the unwashen Windows heathen, and perhaps trading in only a few pixels in screen real-estate to pull it off.  Instead, we got an overpriced &#8216;concept car&#8217; with the safety glass traded in for non-functional style.</p>
<p>Yes, I said it, <strong>non-functional style</strong>.  What about it is &#8216;non-functional&#8217;, you ask?  Let me turn that around to you with another question:  <strong>What do you get for your &#8216;Air&#8217; money that you don&#8217;t get for much less cash in the form of a current MacBook?  That&#8217;s right &#8212; NOTHING.</strong></p>
<p>If Apple wanted something truly marketable to their real audience (not the 6-figure executives who will be toting this &#8216;Queer Eye for a Straight OS&#8217; Wilma-Deering-wanna-be), they would have rolled us a 10-inch diagonal screen with 1024&#215;768 pixels, longer battery life than the &#8217;standard&#8217; MacBooks, an external &#8216;Air&#8217;-like optical drive, and a full complement of ports that don&#8217;t make me have to search around to figure out which Mag-Safe cord goes to which Mag-Safe computer.</p>
<p>I want something halfway between the current MacBook and the now-infamous <a HREF="http://www.OQO.com/" rel="nofollow">OQO</a>.  If Apple isn&#8217;t going to be the one to deliver it to us, then I may end up tired enough to go try seeing what the <a HREF="http://www.linspire.com/" rel="nofollow">Linspire</a> folks have in the way of an Adobe Illustrator clone in their C-N-R (Click-N-Run) library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick gregory</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285704</link>
		<dc:creator>rick gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285704</guid>
		<description>Actually, the specs are fine for general use. No, you don&#039;t want to do heavy video editing on it, but for web coding, general office/IM/web browsing and other similar functions it will be fine. After all, my Macbook Core Duo with 1gb is fine. Let&#039;s get beyond the &#039;everyone must have the hottest machine in the world&#039; stage, OK?

The failing of the Air is more obvious. Anyone who needed a reasonably light machine with good power but not cutting edge specs could have bought a Macbook (not the Pro, the regular ones). I&#039;m typing this on one and it&#039;s about 5 lbs and the battery has always lasted about 4 or 5 hours for me. Same size screen.... same basic specs. For several hundred dollars less. Now, I get that the Air is 2.5 lbs lighter... but really, how many people can carry 2.5lbs... but buckle under 5?

The issue for the Air is that anyone who has wanted a small, medium powered Macbook of reasonable weight has been able to get one for awhile. A few people who just have to have the ultracool design will ante up for this as might people who are thinking about the black Macbook ($1499 with 1G RAM) since the price difference is minimal at that point. And, really, that&#039;s all the Air is... the new top of the Macbook line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the specs are fine for general use. No, you don&#8217;t want to do heavy video editing on it, but for web coding, general office/IM/web browsing and other similar functions it will be fine. After all, my Macbook Core Duo with 1gb is fine. Let&#8217;s get beyond the &#8216;everyone must have the hottest machine in the world&#8217; stage, OK?</p>
<p>The failing of the Air is more obvious. Anyone who needed a reasonably light machine with good power but not cutting edge specs could have bought a Macbook (not the Pro, the regular ones). I&#8217;m typing this on one and it&#8217;s about 5 lbs and the battery has always lasted about 4 or 5 hours for me. Same size screen&#8230;. same basic specs. For several hundred dollars less. Now, I get that the Air is 2.5 lbs lighter&#8230; but really, how many people can carry 2.5lbs&#8230; but buckle under 5?</p>
<p>The issue for the Air is that anyone who has wanted a small, medium powered Macbook of reasonable weight has been able to get one for awhile. A few people who just have to have the ultracool design will ante up for this as might people who are thinking about the black Macbook ($1499 with 1G RAM) since the price difference is minimal at that point. And, really, that&#8217;s all the Air is&#8230; the new top of the Macbook line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schellerscreen &#187; Super Slim Me</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285694</link>
		<dc:creator>schellerscreen &#187; Super Slim Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285694</guid>
		<description>[...] Edit 2: Regarding my Cube guess: wwd has got the same thought. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Edit 2: Regarding my Cube guess: wwd has got the same thought. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Browder</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285687</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Browder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285687</guid>
		<description>Hey now, 2GB is PLENTY of memory for Windows XP and OS X. How do I know? I&#039;ve got 6 different folks with MacBooks and MacBook Pros with 2GB using 1GB for each OS. They&#039;re not just using IE, either, they&#039;re running expensive and resource hungry scientific apps. The irony is that under VM they&#039;re doing more with &quot;less&quot; hardware than a dedicated 2GB Dell system with the same processor. I think the memory is on the money, honey.

It really is the design. Furthermore, it&#039;s the world&#039;s first usable solid-state laptop. Ive shown this thing to users and they all want one. It&#039;s an IDEAL PowerPoint machine. One cord, thats all. It weighs 3 pounds (when you lug around scientific texts all day along with your laptop, pad and paper, etc -- any weight savings is an important one). 

I also agree on the battery. I&#039;ve had my MacBook 2 years and I leave it plugged in more often than I should. No battery problems. If there is a problem, I am sure that Apple Retail Genius folk can replace it on-site while you wait like an iPhone battery (or thats how it should work...)

This is like owning a german car. You&#039;re either going to hack it (self repair DIY) or take it back for maintenance (what apple expects /// arguably, the whole Macintosh line is/was designed around this concept).

So, really, I think after the Solid State model outsells the Hard Disk model (that&#039;ll take over a year), then we&#039;ll see what happens. Perhaps a 12&quot; all flash model is in the wings; they have to start somewhere. It took how many nanos to get flash ram this cheap for a laptop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey now, 2GB is PLENTY of memory for Windows XP and OS X. How do I know? I&#8217;ve got 6 different folks with MacBooks and MacBook Pros with 2GB using 1GB for each OS. They&#8217;re not just using IE, either, they&#8217;re running expensive and resource hungry scientific apps. The irony is that under VM they&#8217;re doing more with &#8220;less&#8221; hardware than a dedicated 2GB Dell system with the same processor. I think the memory is on the money, honey.</p>
<p>It really is the design. Furthermore, it&#8217;s the world&#8217;s first usable solid-state laptop. Ive shown this thing to users and they all want one. It&#8217;s an IDEAL PowerPoint machine. One cord, thats all. It weighs 3 pounds (when you lug around scientific texts all day along with your laptop, pad and paper, etc &#8212; any weight savings is an important one). </p>
<p>I also agree on the battery. I&#8217;ve had my MacBook 2 years and I leave it plugged in more often than I should. No battery problems. If there is a problem, I am sure that Apple Retail Genius folk can replace it on-site while you wait like an iPhone battery (or thats how it should work&#8230;)</p>
<p>This is like owning a german car. You&#8217;re either going to hack it (self repair DIY) or take it back for maintenance (what apple expects /// arguably, the whole Macintosh line is/was designed around this concept).</p>
<p>So, really, I think after the Solid State model outsells the Hard Disk model (that&#8217;ll take over a year), then we&#8217;ll see what happens. Perhaps a 12&#8243; all flash model is in the wings; they have to start somewhere. It took how many nanos to get flash ram this cheap for a laptop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Moore</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285642</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285642</guid>
		<description>I currently use a Mac desktop and a Windows ultraportable, the discontinued Sharp MC4000.  The Sharp is comparable in many ways to the MacBook Air, and I probably use it the way the Air is intended to be used: I take it to town so I can work in cafes, and I take it on business trips. 

I mostly use my Sharp for word processing, blogging, and building a wiki--all pretty simple. If it were a Mac I&#039;d use it to develop Flash in Keynote and might want PhotoShop as well, especially for trips that last weeks. 

I think I connected the Sharp to Ethernet once. I use the optical drive occasionally to watch movies when I don&#039;t feel like getting the TV out of the closet. I use one USB port occasionally, for my thumb drive. So by far the most important considerations in my laptop are weight, wifi reception, battery life, weight, sturdiness, and weight. 

The MacBook Air is half a pound lighter than the Sharp and costs roughly the same. And it&#039;s a Mac. I could do my Keynote development work away from home, and, very importantly, I could use Keynote for my on-the-road presentations. 

I&#039;m anticipating a three-week trip later this year and dread being stuck with Windows the whole time. While one of the cheap Linux-based sub-notebooks would be handy, I&#039;ve already got an iPhone for basic email and surfing. Plus my need for Keynote is unlikely to go away soon. So a Mac ultra-portable has a niche.

I understand how techies would sneer at the  Air, because it *is* feeble as computers go. However, as an ultraportable it really doesn&#039;t seem that bad. I&#039;ll be keeping an eye on it as my Sharp ages. I&#039;ll be especially interested in its battery life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently use a Mac desktop and a Windows ultraportable, the discontinued Sharp MC4000.  The Sharp is comparable in many ways to the MacBook Air, and I probably use it the way the Air is intended to be used: I take it to town so I can work in cafes, and I take it on business trips. </p>
<p>I mostly use my Sharp for word processing, blogging, and building a wiki&#8211;all pretty simple. If it were a Mac I&#8217;d use it to develop Flash in Keynote and might want PhotoShop as well, especially for trips that last weeks. </p>
<p>I think I connected the Sharp to Ethernet once. I use the optical drive occasionally to watch movies when I don&#8217;t feel like getting the TV out of the closet. I use one USB port occasionally, for my thumb drive. So by far the most important considerations in my laptop are weight, wifi reception, battery life, weight, sturdiness, and weight. </p>
<p>The MacBook Air is half a pound lighter than the Sharp and costs roughly the same. And it&#8217;s a Mac. I could do my Keynote development work away from home, and, very importantly, I could use Keynote for my on-the-road presentations. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m anticipating a three-week trip later this year and dread being stuck with Windows the whole time. While one of the cheap Linux-based sub-notebooks would be handy, I&#8217;ve already got an iPhone for basic email and surfing. Plus my need for Keynote is unlikely to go away soon. So a Mac ultra-portable has a niche.</p>
<p>I understand how techies would sneer at the  Air, because it *is* feeble as computers go. However, as an ultraportable it really doesn&#8217;t seem that bad. I&#8217;ll be keeping an eye on it as my Sharp ages. I&#8217;ll be especially interested in its battery life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285570</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/16/morning-after-reaction-to-macbook-air-g4-cube-again/#comment-285570</guid>
		<description>I keep hearing the excuse that this is meant for the &quot;casual user&quot; who just wants to browse the web and send e-mails, not people who edit photos. 

I&#039;m sorry, but for $1800, it BETTER be able to edit my photos and fetch my coffee. Especially given that that my main workhorse for photo editing and whatnot is a Dell Inspiron (you know, bottom of the line) that I just performed a RAM upgrade on. 

The casual user can make do with a $299 Asus EeePc, which rather than fitting in a manilla envelope can be crammed into a coat pocket. 

Coolest thing about the AIR: When all the downsides finally drive you insane, you can snap it over your knee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing the excuse that this is meant for the &#8220;casual user&#8221; who just wants to browse the web and send e-mails, not people who edit photos. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but for $1800, it BETTER be able to edit my photos and fetch my coffee. Especially given that that my main workhorse for photo editing and whatnot is a Dell Inspiron (you know, bottom of the line) that I just performed a RAM upgrade on. </p>
<p>The casual user can make do with a $299 Asus EeePc, which rather than fitting in a manilla envelope can be crammed into a coat pocket. </p>
<p>Coolest thing about the AIR: When all the downsides finally drive you insane, you can snap it over your knee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
