<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Multitasking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/03/in-defense-of-multitasking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/03/in-defense-of-multitasking/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:43:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Noble</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/03/in-defense-of-multitasking/#comment-273138</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/03/in-defense-of-multitasking/#comment-273138</guid>
		<description>In my view, these techniques don&#039;t eliminate multitasking; they reduce it to a manageable level. It&#039;s about restoring some balance in inherently fast and complex work environments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my view, these techniques don&#8217;t eliminate multitasking; they reduce it to a manageable level. It&#8217;s about restoring some balance in inherently fast and complex work environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Byrne</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/03/in-defense-of-multitasking/#comment-273092</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/03/in-defense-of-multitasking/#comment-273092</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the old efficiency vs. effectiveness tradeoff. People multi-task to increase their effectiveness - by working on the right thing at the right time, but obviously there is a loss of efficiency. But working on the wrong thing very efficiently is not generally a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the old efficiency vs. effectiveness tradeoff. People multi-task to increase their effectiveness &#8211; by working on the right thing at the right time, but obviously there is a loss of efficiency. But working on the wrong thing very efficiently is not generally a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
