<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuickBase Goes Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/03/quickbase-goes-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/03/quickbase-goes-enterprise/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/03/quickbase-goes-enterprise/#comment-251053</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/03/quickbase-goes-enterprise/#comment-251053</guid>
		<description>Great blog!  Just discovered this site and I can tell there is a lot of good information here!

My name is Nick Matteucci I am the Chief Technology Officer for the Project Management Institute Information Systems SIG. (Shameless plug: User&#039;s may want to check out our professional society at http://www.pmi-isssig.org) 

I hear a lot about QuickBase as a EPM lately.  I think the reason I have seen so many people so divided on the &quot;QuickBase as enterprise software&quot; debate is the definition of &quot;enterprise&quot;.

On the positive side it is an innocuous tool that can be distributed to large numbers of people with little required methodology, guidance, and training.  I am sure that it beats Excel, Word, or email as a EPM tool.

On the negative side:  It is an &quot;open ended tool&quot; where tables fill up (and shut off) and I would call the EPM type features rudimentary at best.  People tell me it is a good &quot;starter tool&quot; but quickly runs out of capabilities.

Maybe in time it can become a more worthy enterprise human resource management, governance, and dash-boarding solution but for now I think it is more appropriate for the &quot;accidental PM&quot; that wants to manage to-do lists and time but doesn&#039;t want to spend any time getting certified in project management.

I blog on virtual teams, web-based project management, and software selection best practices:  http://www.pmi-issig.org/Learn/ExpertsBlogs/tabid/74/BlogID/6/Default.aspx

This information may be of great help to readers as well. 

Thank you for the great site.  I have enjoyed what I have read so far!

Warm Regards, 

Nick Matteucci</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog!  Just discovered this site and I can tell there is a lot of good information here!</p>
<p>My name is Nick Matteucci I am the Chief Technology Officer for the Project Management Institute Information Systems SIG. (Shameless plug: User&#8217;s may want to check out our professional society at <a href="http://www.pmi-isssig.org)" rel="nofollow">http://www.pmi-isssig.org)</a> </p>
<p>I hear a lot about QuickBase as a EPM lately.  I think the reason I have seen so many people so divided on the &#8220;QuickBase as enterprise software&#8221; debate is the definition of &#8220;enterprise&#8221;.</p>
<p>On the positive side it is an innocuous tool that can be distributed to large numbers of people with little required methodology, guidance, and training.  I am sure that it beats Excel, Word, or email as a EPM tool.</p>
<p>On the negative side:  It is an &#8220;open ended tool&#8221; where tables fill up (and shut off) and I would call the EPM type features rudimentary at best.  People tell me it is a good &#8220;starter tool&#8221; but quickly runs out of capabilities.</p>
<p>Maybe in time it can become a more worthy enterprise human resource management, governance, and dash-boarding solution but for now I think it is more appropriate for the &#8220;accidental PM&#8221; that wants to manage to-do lists and time but doesn&#8217;t want to spend any time getting certified in project management.</p>
<p>I blog on virtual teams, web-based project management, and software selection best practices:  <a href="http://www.pmi-issig.org/Learn/ExpertsBlogs/tabid/74/BlogID/6/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.pmi-issig.org/Learn/ExpertsBlogs/tabid/74/BlogID/6/Default.aspx</a></p>
<p>This information may be of great help to readers as well. </p>
<p>Thank you for the great site.  I have enjoyed what I have read so far!</p>
<p>Warm Regards, </p>
<p>Nick Matteucci</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Phillips</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/03/quickbase-goes-enterprise/#comment-246403</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/03/quickbase-goes-enterprise/#comment-246403</guid>
		<description>People might also want to check out Vertabase 4 project management software (http://www.vertabase.com) -its great for enterprises and groups that are looking for a proven solution that imports directly from MS Excel.

There&#039;s a free trial on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People might also want to check out Vertabase 4 project management software (<a href="http://www.vertabase.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.vertabase.com</a>) -its great for enterprises and groups that are looking for a proven solution that imports directly from MS Excel.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a free trial on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/03/quickbase-goes-enterprise/#comment-245908</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/12/03/quickbase-goes-enterprise/#comment-245908</guid>
		<description>as one of the members of the original quickbase team, it&#039;s great to see this product get some mainstream exposure and adoption.

back in the day, we used quickbase like most companies currently use wikis - it&#039;s flexible enough to be a FAQ, bug tracker, work queue, or to do more traditional database operations.

go quickbase!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as one of the members of the original quickbase team, it&#8217;s great to see this product get some mainstream exposure and adoption.</p>
<p>back in the day, we used quickbase like most companies currently use wikis &#8211; it&#8217;s flexible enough to be a FAQ, bug tracker, work queue, or to do more traditional database operations.</p>
<p>go quickbase!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
