<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWD Coffee Break &#8211; Facebook sales, Interviewing &amp; PDFs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/28/wwd-coffee-break-18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/28/wwd-coffee-break-18/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/28/wwd-coffee-break-18/#comment-246631</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/28/wwd-coffee-break-18/#comment-246631</guid>
		<description>Re: FindingDulcinea:

I couldn&#039;t find anything on their site about:

what search skills they are bringing to the table, 

areas of expertise in topic areas,

or evaluation criteria (currency, accuracy,expertise, bias, resources, etc). 

No background bios to help ascertain POV or possible bias.

I  asked them a week ago about these problems and there has been no response.

There is a need for quality resources that have some of that &#039;librarian&#039; touch; sources analyzed and vetted through some expertise in the topic, providing depth through a wide range of POV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: FindingDulcinea:</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t find anything on their site about:</p>
<p>what search skills they are bringing to the table, </p>
<p>areas of expertise in topic areas,</p>
<p>or evaluation criteria (currency, accuracy,expertise, bias, resources, etc). </p>
<p>No background bios to help ascertain POV or possible bias.</p>
<p>I  asked them a week ago about these problems and there has been no response.</p>
<p>There is a need for quality resources that have some of that &#8216;librarian&#8217; touch; sources analyzed and vetted through some expertise in the topic, providing depth through a wide range of POV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
