<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unveiling Web Worker Daily&#8217;s New Look!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by Eric Gruber</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-252170</link>
		<dc:creator>The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by Eric Gruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-252170</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff_ wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUsually I’m all for a redesign, but I’m deeply saddened to see the old look go. What first drew me to WWD was the bourgeois look and tie-in with the name. I don’t really get that with this design. Not that it’sa bad design; &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff_ wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUsually I’m all for a redesign, but I’m deeply saddened to see the old look go. What first drew me to WWD was the bourgeois look and tie-in with the name. I don’t really get that with this design. Not that it’sa bad design; &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by Noel Hurtley</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-252169</link>
		<dc:creator>The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by Noel Hurtley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-252169</guid>
		<description>[...] sbanboy wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptNeeds some work (as others have pointed out) but I really like the new site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sbanboy wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptNeeds some work (as others have pointed out) but I really like the new site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-252167</link>
		<dc:creator>The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-252167</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWe have been busy this weekend, rolling out new designs. In addition to this blog, WebWorkerDaily got a big makeover too. ACS did the design for WWD. Thanks guys for all your hard work. New WWD is wider, cleaner and […] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWe have been busy this weekend, rolling out new designs. In addition to this blog, WebWorkerDaily got a big makeover too. ACS did the design for WWD. Thanks guys for all your hard work. New WWD is wider, cleaner and […] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syahidali</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-242968</link>
		<dc:creator>syahidali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-242968</guid>
		<description>I feel like i am at a fallout fan site (which is a good thing!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like i am at a fallout fan site (which is a good thing!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily Gets A Makeover Too - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-238608</link>
		<dc:creator>WebWorkerDaily Gets A Makeover Too - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-238608</guid>
		<description>[...]   We have been busy this weekend, rolling out new designs. In addition to this blog, WebWorkerDaily got a big makeover too. ACS did the design for WWD. Thanks guys for all your hard work. New WWD is wider, cleaner and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   We have been busy this weekend, rolling out new designs. In addition to this blog, WebWorkerDaily got a big makeover too. ACS did the design for WWD. Thanks guys for all your hard work. New WWD is wider, cleaner and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foofy</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-238251</link>
		<dc:creator>Foofy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-238251</guid>
		<description>Dave Kebb: Opera is my primary browser and I don&#039;t see a problem with the right-hand column.  What version are you using? 

-- Foofy (Webmaster, GigaOM)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Kebb: Opera is my primary browser and I don&#8217;t see a problem with the right-hand column.  What version are you using? </p>
<p>&#8211; Foofy (Webmaster, GigaOM)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time for a makeover? &#171; Market Like You Mean It</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-238154</link>
		<dc:creator>Time for a makeover? &#171; Market Like You Mean It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-238154</guid>
		<description>[...] of my head, I can think of MSNBC.com, Amazon.com, Barnes &amp; Noble, Freelance Switch, GigaOM and Web Worker Daily that have recently redesigned (or realigned for those in the know). I&#8217;ve also heard rumors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of my head, I can think of MSNBC.com, Amazon.com, Barnes &amp; Noble, Freelance Switch, GigaOM and Web Worker Daily that have recently redesigned (or realigned for those in the know). I&#8217;ve also heard rumors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-238134</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-238134</guid>
		<description>The redesign looks awesome, but what&#039;s up with all the irritating space at the top? The page doesn&#039;t really look good until I scroll two bumps on my scroll wheel. Then the logo is at the top and the ad and other nav is gone. (I wonder if there&#039;s a way to make it so Firefox always scrolls down on the site.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The redesign looks awesome, but what&#8217;s up with all the irritating space at the top? The page doesn&#8217;t really look good until I scroll two bumps on my scroll wheel. Then the logo is at the top and the ad and other nav is gone. (I wonder if there&#8217;s a way to make it so Firefox always scrolls down on the site.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Hurtley</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-237728</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Hurtley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-237728</guid>
		<description>Needs some work (as others have pointed out) but I really like the new site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needs some work (as others have pointed out) but I really like the new site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kebb</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-237385</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kebb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 08:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-237385</guid>
		<description>Fixed width, little fonts, big rh column issue in Opera, Front page headlines totally unrelated to the latest content.

Really, not a well tested redesign. I am so glad of RSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed width, little fonts, big rh column issue in Opera, Front page headlines totally unrelated to the latest content.</p>
<p>Really, not a well tested redesign. I am so glad of RSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Singe</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-237157</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Singe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-237157</guid>
		<description>Looks great, I like the use of the earthy colours. 

Pat on the back to the designers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great, I like the use of the earthy colours. </p>
<p>Pat on the back to the designers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roberthauk</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-237001</link>
		<dc:creator>roberthauk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-237001</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s contemporary - which I like. Apparently the &quot;light&quot; appearance is catching up on the interwebs. So you are amongst the first to set a trend which I believe will dominate the next 1-2 years. Congratulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s contemporary &#8211; which I like. Apparently the &#8220;light&#8221; appearance is catching up on the interwebs. So you are amongst the first to set a trend which I believe will dominate the next 1-2 years. Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thunk Different.</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-236870</link>
		<dc:creator>Thunk Different.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-236870</guid>
		<description>While GigaOm is much improved, I can&#039;t say the same for WWD. I like the old communist grindstone look, now its... biege.

Anyway, content is king!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While GigaOm is much improved, I can&#8217;t say the same for WWD. I like the old communist grindstone look, now its&#8230; biege.</p>
<p>Anyway, content is king!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amie Gillingham</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-236829</link>
		<dc:creator>Amie Gillingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-236829</guid>
		<description>I think it looks fantastic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it looks fantastic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Zelenka</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-236812</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Zelenka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-236812</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments and feedback, everyone. Fortunately, our RSS feed has full articles now so you don&#039;t have feel assaulted by beige ;)

While the black may appeal to a certain set, for some (for me!) it felt claustrophobic and depressing. It wasn&#039;t welcoming or kind. It may have been a turnoff for some people we&#039;d like to reach with our message about how the web changes work. 

Also, while web working is revolutionary for many people, for others the web just offers a way of improving on already-good working situations. Most knowledge workers aren&#039;t exploited (some are outright coddled with cushy benefits and high salaries) but can still benefit from web ways of working.

Still, I can see why people would resonate with that imaging/branding. Revolutionary change is cool, and we&#039;re still in favor of that when warranted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments and feedback, everyone. Fortunately, our RSS feed has full articles now so you don&#8217;t have feel assaulted by beige ;)</p>
<p>While the black may appeal to a certain set, for some (for me!) it felt claustrophobic and depressing. It wasn&#8217;t welcoming or kind. It may have been a turnoff for some people we&#8217;d like to reach with our message about how the web changes work. </p>
<p>Also, while web working is revolutionary for many people, for others the web just offers a way of improving on already-good working situations. Most knowledge workers aren&#8217;t exploited (some are outright coddled with cushy benefits and high salaries) but can still benefit from web ways of working.</p>
<p>Still, I can see why people would resonate with that imaging/branding. Revolutionary change is cool, and we&#8217;re still in favor of that when warranted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sweet</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-236721</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-236721</guid>
		<description>Or you can use pageflakes or bloglines and read the blogs the way YOU want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you can use pageflakes or bloglines and read the blogs the way YOU want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
