<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Tips for Integrating Tagging into Your Web Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tag</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-291460</link>
		<dc:creator>Tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-291460</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I am new to tagging, so this was interesting. I think the entire idea is really cool. There is just so much information on the Internet, we need ways to organize it topically. I would think, however, that the sites will need to start sharing their tagged info. Seems like all the tag cloud sites are building these massive databases in their walled cities. At some point, that will need to be aggregated via APIs... We&#039;re not there, but I would imaging it&#039;s coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I am new to tagging, so this was interesting. I think the entire idea is really cool. There is just so much information on the Internet, we need ways to organize it topically. I would think, however, that the sites will need to start sharing their tagged info. Seems like all the tag cloud sites are building these massive databases in their walled cities. At some point, that will need to be aggregated via APIs&#8230; We&#8217;re not there, but I would imaging it&#8217;s coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-204778</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-204778</guid>
		<description>Tagging on the web has become a fairly mature technology, and a very useful one. However, what interests me even more (because so far no one seems to have implemented it) is the potential benefits of managing ALL information with tags, especially files on one&#039;s own desktop system. The storage capacities even of handheld devices begin to approach a level where the traditional, hierarchical top-down system of folders and subfolders has become onerous and limiting. A really useful application would combine local and web tagging in one interface. The Linux-KDE Konqueror web/file browser is almost an example of what I am talking about, except that (as far as I know) there is no way for the user to assign tags to files or URLs. I believe that it would be more efficient to concentrate on the application rather than the content, because: people view many files and websites through one browser. Thus the programming and development would be better spent on the one rather than the many. I also believe that open-source is the best approach because once the concept has been developed and refined, then the community can port it over to a multitude of other applications; this will &#039;seed&#039; the ecosystem leading to rapid market growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tagging on the web has become a fairly mature technology, and a very useful one. However, what interests me even more (because so far no one seems to have implemented it) is the potential benefits of managing ALL information with tags, especially files on one&#8217;s own desktop system. The storage capacities even of handheld devices begin to approach a level where the traditional, hierarchical top-down system of folders and subfolders has become onerous and limiting. A really useful application would combine local and web tagging in one interface. The Linux-KDE Konqueror web/file browser is almost an example of what I am talking about, except that (as far as I know) there is no way for the user to assign tags to files or URLs. I believe that it would be more efficient to concentrate on the application rather than the content, because: people view many files and websites through one browser. Thus the programming and development would be better spent on the one rather than the many. I also believe that open-source is the best approach because once the concept has been developed and refined, then the community can port it over to a multitude of other applications; this will &#8217;seed&#8217; the ecosystem leading to rapid market growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One in 10 online users in the United States uses tags</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-204735</link>
		<dc:creator>One in 10 online users in the United States uses tags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-204735</guid>
		<description>[...] is suggesting “5 Tips for Integrating Tagging into Your Web Business”, based on the Forrester&#8217;s research, as follows: •  Consider using taxonomy-directed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is suggesting “5 Tips for Integrating Tagging into Your Web Business”, based on the Forrester&#8217;s research, as follows: •  Consider using taxonomy-directed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web2innovations</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203790</link>
		<dc:creator>web2innovations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203790</guid>
		<description>You may want to check NosyJoe out at http://NosyJoe.com and http://NosyJoe.com/about.php

It incorporates an intelligent content tagging engine, among other interesting features.

Others in the field are Jiglu.com and recently Twine.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to check NosyJoe out at <a href="http://NosyJoe.com" rel="nofollow">http://NosyJoe.com</a> and <a href="http://NosyJoe.com/about.php" rel="nofollow">http://NosyJoe.com/about.php</a></p>
<p>It incorporates an intelligent content tagging engine, among other interesting features.</p>
<p>Others in the field are Jiglu.com and recently Twine.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel R</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203647</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203647</guid>
		<description>&quot;one in 10 online consumers in the United States tags something on the Web at least monthly&quot;

Can we have a source please? I&#039;m very curious about these numbers. Are these from Forrester?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;one in 10 online consumers in the United States tags something on the Web at least monthly&#8221;</p>
<p>Can we have a source please? I&#8217;m very curious about these numbers. Are these from Forrester?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southwest SEO picks for October 23rd : SouthwestSEO.com</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203372</link>
		<dc:creator>Southwest SEO picks for October 23rd : SouthwestSEO.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203372</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 Tips for Integrating Tagging into Your Web Business « Web Worker Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 Tips for Integrating Tagging into Your Web Business « Web Worker Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIGITALISTIC &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-23</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203293</link>
		<dc:creator>DIGITALISTIC &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203293</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 Tips for Integrating Tagging into Your Web Business (tags: tagging webworkerdaily forrester tag taxonomy endecatechnologies mercadosoftware powerreviews socialtagging) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 Tips for Integrating Tagging into Your Web Business (tags: tagging webworkerdaily forrester tag taxonomy endecatechnologies mercadosoftware powerreviews socialtagging) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dian</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203187</link>
		<dc:creator>Dian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203187</guid>
		<description>Actually, Vanderwal, the individual need/desire to tag was part of the report -- but I couldn&#039;t figure out how to turn that into a &quot;tip.&quot; My bad, not the author&#039;s. Any insights on that you could offer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Vanderwal, the individual need/desire to tag was part of the report &#8212; but I couldn&#8217;t figure out how to turn that into a &#8220;tip.&#8221; My bad, not the author&#8217;s. Any insights on that you could offer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanderwal</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203168</link>
		<dc:creator>vanderwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/23/5-tips-for-integrating-tagging-into-your-web-business/#comment-203168</guid>
		<description>Hmm, seems Forrester has another poorly understood concept in an expensive paper. There is no mention of social tagging being from the person tagging to hold onto the information or object. The focus is the common old school approach that people are tagging to add things to the system. They tag for their own reasons (there are many), but largely because the central methods do not work for finding in their vocabulary or contexts. 

The report sounds like it gets ease of use right and the privacy question (few good answers so far in the tools). The surfacing for search is really short sighted as it is also much more complicated than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, seems Forrester has another poorly understood concept in an expensive paper. There is no mention of social tagging being from the person tagging to hold onto the information or object. The focus is the common old school approach that people are tagging to add things to the system. They tag for their own reasons (there are many), but largely because the central methods do not work for finding in their vocabulary or contexts. </p>
<p>The report sounds like it gets ease of use right and the privacy question (few good answers so far in the tools). The surfacing for search is really short sighted as it is also much more complicated than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
