<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quechup with a Side of Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Curious297</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-290999</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious297</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-290999</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did a google search and found so many bad comments about this site. I also joined but didn&#039;t let them check my address book but what I see is I they wont even let a standard member reply to a premium member so what are the premium members paying for? I also got a lot of emails from the same person and when I tried to read my emails I got this Automated reply:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot; Free membership entitles you to read unlimited &#039;quick messages&#039; and 1 normal message a day (GMT time). To read and send unlimited messages please upgrade to premium membership.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I mean, c&#039;on, 1 message per day!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People who pay for membership can only talk with other members even though you have paid for the service. Now you know why the &quot;non premium&quot; members you write to cannot answer or reply. Premium members should be able to contact anyone on the site regardless of membership level.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am canceling my membership, I hate sites that try to bring the community together when they only looking for a quick buck!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did a google search and found so many bad comments about this site. I also joined but didn&#8217;t let them check my address book but what I see is I they wont even let a standard member reply to a premium member so what are the premium members paying for? I also got a lot of emails from the same person and when I tried to read my emails I got this Automated reply:</p>

<p>&#8221; Free membership entitles you to read unlimited &#8216;quick messages&#8217; and 1 normal message a day (GMT time). To read and send unlimited messages please upgrade to premium membership.&#8221;</p>

<p>I mean, c&#8217;on, 1 message per day!!</p>

<p>People who pay for membership can only talk with other members even though you have paid for the service. Now you know why the &#8220;non premium&#8221; members you write to cannot answer or reply. Premium members should be able to contact anyone on the site regardless of membership level.</p>

<p>I am canceling my membership, I hate sites that try to bring the community together when they only looking for a quick buck!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logo designer</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-264913</link>
		<dc:creator>Logo designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-264913</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I had a bunch of invite e-mails this autumn from people whom I could never suspect to invite me to such network.
So, now the mystery is solved.
I wonder did they thought about consequences and community reaction to this dirty trick?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a bunch of invite e-mails this autumn from people whom I could never suspect to invite me to such network.
So, now the mystery is solved.
I wonder did they thought about consequences and community reaction to this dirty trick?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelli&#8217;s Sentiments</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-169575</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelli&#8217;s Sentiments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 02:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-169575</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Quechup With A Side of Spam DC Metro Moms Blog [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quechup With A Side of Spam DC Metro Moms Blog [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Cornell</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-168409</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-168409</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve had a handful of these, but I did something that turned out to be smart. When the first one came, I emailed the person who supposedly sent it and asked what the site was, what it&#039;s good for, and how it relates to competing ones (e.g., LinkedIn). He wrote back right away - &quot;Don&#039;t do it! It&#039;s insidious SPAM and caught me.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition, from a networking perspective, it was a great excuse to maintain a little human contact. So two plusses!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a handful of these, but I did something that turned out to be smart. When the first one came, I emailed the person who supposedly sent it and asked what the site was, what it&#8217;s good for, and how it relates to competing ones (e.g., LinkedIn). He wrote back right away &#8211; &#8220;Don&#8217;t do it! It&#8217;s insidious SPAM and caught me.&#8221;</p>

<p>In addition, from a networking perspective, it was a great excuse to maintain a little human contact. So two plusses!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Valan</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-167896</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Valan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-167896</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;All your points are well made but when a respected blogger sends out an invite its hard not to sign up, especially if one has spent a very long day working virtually non-stop. I assumed he had done his homework. In any case here&#039;s my somewhat long note via the Quechup mail system ( I apologize in advance to the other readers of this site for boring them). Also I just found a couple of direct emails of the president and a VP from the Mashable site and I plan to spam them&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Guys&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was invited by a blogging acquaintance to join your site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sadly I did without doing proper due diligence and the iDate owners, marketing geniuses and your software designers, a bunch of bottom feeders-let me be polite and not express my feelings, have serious screwed me over either intentionally or inadvertently. First of all I assumed it was some sort of a social networking site and Quechup turned out to be another spam engine. The fact that I was asked a bunch of personal details should have set off alarm bells but having worked non-stop for 18+ hours I signed on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I signed up as a heterosexual and most heteros typically would like to meet a WOMAN, unless you play for both teams, which I don&#039;t. So why the heck would you all send it to my entire freaking gmail email list where I have all my professional/business colleagues. And you did not seek my permission either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is absolutely unacceptable and if you do not remove my name from your membership rolls and DELETE ALL MY contacts I will inform (whether or not they pay any attention to my email) all the major web 2.0 software review sites including Techcrunch, Gigaom and other even more nastier review sites - its your call. I will do this by Friday Sept 7th unless you do as I ask and send me mail to confirm that you have deleted my name and my gmail contacts from your database.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gary Valan&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PS: In case if more of you want to spam these idiots: According to their website, www.idatecorp.com, their CEO is Mark Finch and can be contacted at mark@idatecorp.com. Glen Finch is the Vice President and can be contacted at glen@idatecorp.com. I&#039;ll add some joy to their lives in a couple of minutes...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All your points are well made but when a respected blogger sends out an invite its hard not to sign up, especially if one has spent a very long day working virtually non-stop. I assumed he had done his homework. In any case here&#8217;s my somewhat long note via the Quechup mail system ( I apologize in advance to the other readers of this site for boring them). Also I just found a couple of direct emails of the president and a VP from the Mashable site and I plan to spam them&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;Guys</p>

<p>I was invited by a blogging acquaintance to join your site.</p>

<p>Sadly I did without doing proper due diligence and the iDate owners, marketing geniuses and your software designers, a bunch of bottom feeders-let me be polite and not express my feelings, have serious screwed me over either intentionally or inadvertently. First of all I assumed it was some sort of a social networking site and Quechup turned out to be another spam engine. The fact that I was asked a bunch of personal details should have set off alarm bells but having worked non-stop for 18+ hours I signed on.</p>

<p>I signed up as a heterosexual and most heteros typically would like to meet a WOMAN, unless you play for both teams, which I don&#8217;t. So why the heck would you all send it to my entire freaking gmail email list where I have all my professional/business colleagues. And you did not seek my permission either.</p>

<p>This is absolutely unacceptable and if you do not remove my name from your membership rolls and DELETE ALL MY contacts I will inform (whether or not they pay any attention to my email) all the major web 2.0 software review sites including Techcrunch, Gigaom and other even more nastier review sites &#8211; its your call. I will do this by Friday Sept 7th unless you do as I ask and send me mail to confirm that you have deleted my name and my gmail contacts from your database.</p>

<p>Gary Valan&#8221;</p>

<p>PS: In case if more of you want to spam these idiots: According to their website, <a href="http://www.idatecorp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.idatecorp.com</a>, their CEO is Mark Finch and can be contacted at <a href="mailto:mark@idatecorp.com">mark@idatecorp.com</a>. Glen Finch is the Vice President and can be contacted at <a href="mailto:glen@idatecorp.com">glen@idatecorp.com</a>. I&#8217;ll add some joy to their lives in a couple of minutes&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labnotes &#187; Rounded Corners - 142 (If you can't beat them ...)</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-166687</link>
		<dc:creator>Labnotes &#187; Rounded Corners - 142 (If you can't beat them ...)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-166687</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the senders: Don&#8217;t sweat it. Not your fault Quechup decided to misappropriate your address [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the senders: Don&#8217;t sweat it. Not your fault Quechup decided to misappropriate your address [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-166445</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-166445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think Quechup is directed to idiots. Anyone also received mails from other members? I did, but I&quot;m 100% sure that they&#039;re fake.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Quechup is directed to idiots. Anyone also received mails from other members? I did, but I&#8221;m 100% sure that they&#8217;re fake.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwl</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-166431</link>
		<dc:creator>cwl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-166431</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ummm, am I the only one who thinks that Quechup is just one big scheme to harvest email addresses for the purposes of spamming the world?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm, am I the only one who thinks that Quechup is just one big scheme to harvest email addresses for the purposes of spamming the world?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen (Pediascribe)</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-166428</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen (Pediascribe)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-166428</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was caught by the whole Quechup thing this weekend. Thinking &quot;how could I be so stupid and get caught by this,&quot; I created a dummy yahoo email address and went through the sign up again to figure out what I missed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a key line that was in the disclaimer (I copied it for future reference) :&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Complete your
account details below &amp; we&#039;ll check your contacts for
matches on Quechup so you can choose who to invite to
your Friends Network and invite non Quechup members to
join you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you see that part there......&quot;SO YOU CAN CHOOSE WHO TO INVITE.....&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I had no choice. They invited everyone!
It&#039;s dirty and underhanded what they did this weekend. The lesson I learned was before I join anything I should Google Blog Search it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was caught by the whole Quechup thing this weekend. Thinking &#8220;how could I be so stupid and get caught by this,&#8221; I created a dummy yahoo email address and went through the sign up again to figure out what I missed.</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s a key line that was in the disclaimer (I copied it for future reference) :</p>

<p>Complete your
account details below &amp; we&#8217;ll check your contacts for
matches on Quechup so you can choose who to invite to
your Friends Network and invite non Quechup members to
join you.</p>

<p>Do you see that part there&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;SO YOU CAN CHOOSE WHO TO INVITE&#8230;..&#8221;</p>

<p>I had no choice. They invited everyone!
It&#8217;s dirty and underhanded what they did this weekend. The lesson I learned was before I join anything I should Google Blog Search it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the head lemur</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-165940</link>
		<dc:creator>the head lemur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/09/05/quechup-with-a-side-of-spam/#comment-165940</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Quechup The Clap of FaceBook
http://www.ravinglunacy.org/index.php/2007/09/05/quechup-the-clap-of-facebook/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quechup The Clap of FaceBook
<a href="http://www.ravinglunacy.org/index.php/2007/09/05/quechup-the-clap-of-facebook/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ravinglunacy.org/index.php/2007/09/05/quechup-the-clap-of-facebook/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
