Mac OS X Leopard at WWDC: What’s a Web Worker to Love?
June 11th, 2007 (5:52pm) Judi Sohn 27 Comments
It’s Stevenote time again, and that means that the Mac faithful gather round their liveblogging screens to happily swim in the fruity Kool Aid. This time it’s the Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC) in San Francisco, CA.
The big news was a deeper preview of Leopard (Mac OS X) than we have seen before. The slides boast 300 new features. But he’s probably counting the reflective “floor” of the dock as a feature. Not going to do a whole lot for your billing rate, is it? So what did Steve Jobs say to his flock that will make a difference to those of us who earn our livings based on our digital lifestyles?
Leopard is still shipping in October for $129. What’s more than eye candy and really interesting for web workers:
The new Finder will have a beefed up sidebar for easier cataloging of searches and items. If you have a .Mac account, you can search the contents of other Macs linked to your account. This is helpful, provided you have that .Mac account. Will this be the feature that finally makes the service worth $99 per year? Will .Mac finally get past the performance issues that have made it painful to use? Maybe. In Tiger (OS X 10.4) you could enter keywords to quickly search for files in an iTunes-like window. Leopard incorporates more of the iTunes interface into the Finder by adding Cover Flow, with a visual flip-book of files. This can be handy, provided it’s snappy.
Quick Look lets you preview multi-page documents without launching their respective applications. Interesting. It will remain to be seen what non-Apple, non-Microsoft applications can use this technology. Anything that saves times is good for the web worker.
Spaces is a wonderful web worker feature. When your work life and your personal life happen on the same computer in the same room, Spaces is how you can “leave” the office at the end of the day. Virtual desktops is nothing new, even for Mac OS X. But now the functionality is built in to the operating system.
Mail and iCal are still the biggest web worker disappointments from Apple. So much potential not fully realized. We live and die by our email, and Apple somehow thinks we spend our day designing postcards of our last vacation to send to Grandma? Serious web workers are probably going to stick to Thunderbird or Gmail. The improvements to these productivity apps are so superficial in Leopard, they weren’t even worth mentioning in today’s presentation.
The big news in iChat, for those of us who would get bored of changing silly backdrops after 5 minutes, is the ability to show a file such as a presentation or video in an iChat session. Back when Leopard was first previewed, there was talk of a remote control feature. From the Google cached page:
Share and share alike
Remote control takes on a whole new meaning with iChat in Leopard. Thanks to iChat Screen Sharing, you and your buddy can observe and control a single desktop via iChat, making it a cinch to collaborate with colleagues, browse the Web with a friend, or pick the perfect plane seats with your spouse. Share your own desktop or share your buddy’s - you both have complete control at all times. And when you start a Screen Sharing session, iChat automatically initiates an audio chat so you can talk things through while you’re at it.
This paragraph is completely missing from the current preview page. Too bad. Showing a one-way demo is not nearly as interesting as real-time file collaboration.
Steve Jobs is famous for saving the biggest announcements for a last “one more thing.” Safari sees version 3, available as a beta download now. Inline searching and tabbed browsing aren’t exactly cutting edge nowadays. The news here is that the Apple browser is now available for Windows. It’s all for the sake of the iPhone, which will work on the Windows platform and therefore must “talk” to a browser. You didn’t seriously think it would sync bookmarks with Internet Explorer 7, did you? So Safari for Windows it is. If you’re not planning to buy an iPhone, is there a good reason to ditch Firefox for Safari?
Speak of iPhone, the much anticipated mobile device is not as closed to 3rd party developers as originally thought. Developers can write “Web 2.0″ applications for the iPhone as they would for the browser that appear to run as fully realized applications on the phone. Time will tell just how creative and productivity-minded these 3rd party apps will be.
What do you think…is this an operating system worth waiting another 4 months for?
27 Comments Post your own comment
JohnDoe says: June 11th, 2007 6:58pm
“…is this an operating system worth waiting another 4 months for…” Or what? Stomp your foot in protest?
OS X tiger is completely modern, serviceable operating system with UNIX underpinnings and stability. I warrant even power users haven’t outpaced it’s technology, yet. What is 4 months wait for an update: nothing. I’d rather wait 4 years than backslide into Microsoft products.
Sergio says: June 11th, 2007 7:08pm
I think $129 is a little steep for the number of useful new features. The new Finder is still an underachiever IMHO. Improving it shouldn’t count as a feature, it’s more like obligation. Maybe the greatest advance is under the hood, the 64-bit code base and Core Animation. But, regardless of how lackluster it seems to me, I’ll still cough up the cash and upgrade my system when October comes. That’s just the kind of nut I am.
Kris Tuttle says: June 11th, 2007 7:19pm
Your comments don’t make the new release sound very exciting. Now that you mention it does seem strange that Mail, iCal and Safari are such losers and probably represent at least 1/3 of my computing time. They also seem like pretty low-hanging fruit but maybe that’s for the next release. Like most I expect my other programs on OS X are mostly from Microsoft and Adobe. The only Apple software I use on OS X is iTunes and iPhoto for personal stuff.
The multiple desktop option could be interesting but for me it would have to work in conjuction with other software contexts like Google, WordPress and Dreamweaver.
Good practical review of what’s coming. Thanks.
Justin Pease says: June 11th, 2007 7:21pm
Didn’t see the Keynote, but I’ve been watching the new feature videos on the Apple site.
The fact that “windows reflecting on the floor” was highlighted as an exciting new feature of the Operating System seemed a little lame.
Spaces is useful but, as you said, nothing new. I’ve been using VirtueDesktops.
Time machine seems like a nice way to handle the ever so important detail of data backup.
I like the folders in the dock. Again, nothing new, but seems like a nice implementation that will help to keep the desktop clutter free.
As far as waiting 4 months. No problem. OSX Tiger is working great for me right now.
Judi Sohn says: June 11th, 2007 7:45pm
@Johndoe: OS X is not competing with MS/Vista here. It’s competing with itself. Is what we’ve seen so far worth $129 and the hassle of upgrading? I’m not convinced yet.
MonkeyT says: June 11th, 2007 7:45pm
For screen sharing, it looks like the description is now more closely tied to the Finder rather than iChat. Seems like it’s being pitched as a combination of remote desktop and VNC.
From the Apple site:
With shared computers automatically displayed in the sidebar, it’s far easier to find or access files on any computer in your house, whether Mac or PC. All it takes is a click. But here’s where things get really interesting. By clicking on a connected Mac, you can see and control that computer (if authorized, of course) as if you were sitting in front of it. You can even search all the computers in the house to find what you’re looking for.
luke says: June 11th, 2007 8:05pm
Yes i think its worth waiting for. And if i really have to answer why is because it will work unlike Vista Ultima which i do own and try to run dual booting with xp. Only reason im even in vista it seems to see if something else i like works. Just bought a brand new macbook pro with santa rosa 2.4 and i can’t be more happier or proud. And ID and EA announcing that they are gonna jump on apple’s bandwagon with games why wouldn’t we switch. Only flaw i seen reall y with anything we got with osx was safari. I’m running the new 3.0 now and hopes it doesn’t crash and seems to work great so far. I was planning on building another gaming machine in 6 months and since i seen ID on stage with jobs lol why should i bother. I’m just waiting on ddr3 to become mainstream and new chip architecture for my next gaming machine. Microsoft only offers me randomness and a usually unstable OS. Microsoft is going to be backed into a corner and if it doesn’t watch it will get a sucker punch for being the sucker.
L Kern says: June 11th, 2007 8:29pm
Kool-aide drinkers? KOOL-AIDE DRINKERS?!?
You musy have us confused with Republicans or the Windows faithful.
Our shit works.
Jeremy Wilhelm says: June 11th, 2007 8:31pm
I think the highlighted Mail features that recognize dates and addresses and integrate with iCal and the Address book look useful. There is certainly nothing like that in the current Mail. Plus having to-do lists, notes, RSS feeds, and a more versatile side bar all look pretty productive to me. Of course, I may be unaware of what would be useful to a web worker, since I am not one :-)
Feroz Siddiqui says: June 11th, 2007 8:43pm
This years WWDC was probably the most lack lusture one.. I was expecting a new line of iMac.. i dont like the current Briefcase form factor models. As for Leopard for the common user every feature counts.. yeah the price could have been $99. Steve are you listening…? :)
GigaOM What’s to love about Mac OS X Leopard? « says: June 11th, 2007 9:12pm
[...] shipping in October for $129. What’s more than eye candy and really interesting? Find out on Web Worker Daily Share This | Sphere | Print | Topic: Asides [...]
What does Leopard have for us. « b3n’s Mind says: June 11th, 2007 10:56pm
[...] What does Leopard have for us. 11 06 2007 Find out on Web Worker Daily. [...]
Judi Sohn says: June 12th, 2007 3:18am
@MonkeyT: That’s true. But when that feature was tied to iChat, it was part of the OS and available to anyone who was running Leopard (both ways). Now, it appears that it requires .Mac *and* Leopard, which will severely limit its usefulness, don’t you think?
It’s no longer about collaborating with a colleague I’m chatting with about that file we’re both working on by letting us “sit next to each other.” It’s now a way for me to control my living room computer from my bedroom computer, which I couldn’t care less about.
Unless I’m reading it wrong. What do you guys think?
Jr. Shabadoo says: June 12th, 2007 5:08am
leopard in and of itself may be a little less than some of the more ravenous among might have hoped, but apple’s engineers are *smart* and *creative*. the “stack” metaphor was recently ballyhooed as a brilliant experimental desktop replacement metaphor–granted that apple’s implementation is dumbed-down; but with the concurrent release of core animation, any kind of stacking, shuffling, and grouping mechanisms become not only possible, but trivial. the future is much closer in leopard than in vista, unless you like coffee tables crammed with video cameras.
also, the current blob of commentary gives (extremely) short shrift to quicklook, or whatever it’s called. arguably, apple is undercutting itself by breaking it out as a feature-unto-itself; but in conjunction with the other enhancements to finder, like cover flow, it addresses the largest and hungriest time sink in my computing life: farting around the damned file system for files, and suffering while apps load merely so i can have a look to see if i’m where i want to be.
and a solid, 64-bit os is nothing to sneeze at.
sure, the thrust of the article is “the web worker”, and there, too, writers are fundamentally misapprehending the importance of some of these new features: mail, for example, is slowly morphing into a free-form database as well an adequate mail client. with the right api’s it’ll become something marvellous, especially if it gloms onto the ichat collaboration api’s.
and it looks damned magnificent. what’s wrong with that? why the reticence to plunk down $129 bucks for an os in which you spend most of your workday, ever day, when we piss away money on trivial nonsense without a second thought?
Judi Sohn says: June 12th, 2007 7:17am
@Jr. Shabadoo: Because upgrading one’s operating system is never trivial. For me, it’s not the money. It’s the time and research that has to go into making sure the upgrade goes smoothly. More than just a backup, you have to make sure that all of your utilities and applications won’t have problems in the new OS. Perhaps it’s trivial for those that only use Apple software, but for those of us that have a mix of old & new, on & offline applications it’s way more than a purely financial decision.
I love the concept of QuickLook. I just hope Adobe has a plug-in for InDesign files.
Michael says: June 12th, 2007 7:57am
The improved functionality provided by the new sidebar in Finder has been around in Windows Explorer since at least Windows 98. For this latest release, I’d say Apple is copying a few of Microsoft’s tricks!
Scott says: June 12th, 2007 8:52am
As is often the case, the biggest improvements are likely to be under the hood, visible only to sysadmins and UNIX geeks, and will go unnoticed and unappreciated by 90% of the Mac user base. One of those improvements will be replacing Mac’s antiquated filesystem (HFS+, resource forks and all) with the most advanced filesystem currently available (Sun’s ZFS). In fact, Apple could have used ZFS’s snapshot capabilities to build Time Machine functionality (although I’m not sure whether Time Machine is just a GUI to ZFS snapshots, or if Apple reinvented the wheel here to preserve compatibility for users that want to use other filesystems). Other welcome updates will probably be seen in launchd, ACL/MAC controls and other security improvements (will Apple finally adopt OpenBSD’s memory randomization across the whole OS? Microsoft will still have beat them to the punch here; Vista supports a layered approach to security that includes address-space randomization that Apple still doesn’t support, even though Apple is built at least partly on BSD …)
The stuff I’m most interested in will probably never make it into a keynote and will remain unknown to most users - but will be foundational to the stability and security of the OS in ways that shiny new widgets never will.
jetteroheller says: June 12th, 2007 9:05am
Every time I read something about MacOS X Leopard, I think it says, MacOS Leotard. Is that a Freudian slip?
Leopard — I’ll be delaying my upgrade « Iain’s Chips & Tech says: June 12th, 2007 9:36am
[...] GigaOm’s Webworker Daily has a good post on Leopard. [...]
Scott says: June 12th, 2007 10:48am
nevermind; apparently ZFS will not ship with Leopard after all (via slashdot):
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199903281
(what IS IT with OS vendors being unable to ship improved filesystems anyway? Microsoft letting WinFS slip is predictable, but I expected better from Apple … or it could be another case of Steve retaliating for vendors stealing his thunder on product announcements.)
too bad; ZFS’ built-in volume mgmt capabilities (among other features) would have made for some fascinating user-land app/utility possibilities.
David Russell says: June 12th, 2007 12:14pm
Certainly not Safari 3 if the garbage they pass off as a Windows version is anything to go buy.
gwhiz says: June 12th, 2007 1:46pm
I’d say Web Worker should love a LOT on Leopard Server. Mongo goodness there!
peter says: June 12th, 2007 1:49pm
I was just about to go buy a new macbook. I wonder if I should wait. I don’t want to upgrade after a few months.
Top Posts « WordPress.com says: June 12th, 2007 4:58pm
[...] Mac OS X Leopard at WWDC: What’s a Web Worker to Love? It’s Stevenote time again, and that means that the Mac faithful gather round their liveblogging screens to […] [...]
A View from Home » Has anyone compiled a list of what's been pulled from Leopard? says: June 13th, 2007 5:19am
[...] noticed when I was working on my Web Worker Daily piece about the Leopard keynote at WWDC that Apple pulled the iChat remote desktop feature. Originally, you were going to be able to [...]
Brad says: June 13th, 2007 2:35pm
Ruh Roh! Looks like the iFags have come out in full force to defend the Company and the Steve!!!
Our $h!t works and MSFT crapware doesn’t!! Bleat away sheep! Bleat away!
LMAO. 2.49% Cult of Mactards continues. I hope leopard ‘accessorizes’ well with your ‘lifestyles’.
VeronicasLore.com » Windows share as seen on Leopard says: June 24th, 2007 10:09am
[...] Webworkerdaily.com [...]