<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telepresence &#8211; Wave of the Past?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/</link>
	<description>Rebooting the workforce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Collaboration: Video Conferencing</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-329798</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Collaboration: Video Conferencing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-329798</guid>
		<description>[...] fixed telepresence systems such as those offered by Cisco are aimed at the enterprise and so are unlikely to be used by many web workers, there is already a huge choice of web app video conferencing options available in this highly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fixed telepresence systems such as those offered by Cisco are aimed at the enterprise and so are unlikely to be used by many web workers, there is already a huge choice of web app video conferencing options available in this highly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-Premise Videoconferencing: Not for Web Workers? &#171; Web Worker Daily</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-197253</link>
		<dc:creator>On-Premise Videoconferencing: Not for Web Workers? &#171; Web Worker Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-197253</guid>
		<description>[...] Worker Daily&#8217;s Mike Gunderloy has questioned telepresence for web workers, saying &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t offer a lot to the web worker who is already out on the cutting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Worker Daily&#8217;s Mike Gunderloy has questioned telepresence for web workers, saying &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t offer a lot to the web worker who is already out on the cutting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry ferrarri</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-133502</link>
		<dc:creator>larry ferrarri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-133502</guid>
		<description>Seems like you all just don&#039;t understand business.
Take outsourcing, for example.

Indiatek has a 2 year contract with Z trade (a US Company) to develop anything tech.
Indiatek is required to have 1 person in the US for every 4 in India.
To move projects along, Ztrade sends people from the US to India, incurring 52 hours of travel time for essentially 2 days (max) of meetings. IndiaTek cannot send people as they cnnot get temporary visa&#039;s. If they do, there is a 90 day delay.

Indiatek, in their infinite wisdom, puts in Telepresence from India to Z trade.
They now have overcome alot of issues in their projects for both companies,
And guess what? They created &quot;stickiness&quot; with their customer. so when 
Banglagoretek comes in to underbid them, Z trade says&quot;will you install a TP system so we can communicate effectively?

Before you ALL comment on telepresence perhaps you should get a demo.
Only UNIMPORTANT PAWNS in business frown upon this and cannot realize its importance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like you all just don&#8217;t understand business.<br />
Take outsourcing, for example.</p>
<p>Indiatek has a 2 year contract with Z trade (a US Company) to develop anything tech.<br />
Indiatek is required to have 1 person in the US for every 4 in India.<br />
To move projects along, Ztrade sends people from the US to India, incurring 52 hours of travel time for essentially 2 days (max) of meetings. IndiaTek cannot send people as they cnnot get temporary visa&#8217;s. If they do, there is a 90 day delay.</p>
<p>Indiatek, in their infinite wisdom, puts in Telepresence from India to Z trade.<br />
They now have overcome alot of issues in their projects for both companies,<br />
And guess what? They created &#8220;stickiness&#8221; with their customer. so when<br />
Banglagoretek comes in to underbid them, Z trade says&#8221;will you install a TP system so we can communicate effectively?</p>
<p>Before you ALL comment on telepresence perhaps you should get a demo.<br />
Only UNIMPORTANT PAWNS in business frown upon this and cannot realize its importance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Downes : Collaboration with surfaces</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-79194</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Downes : Collaboration with surfaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-79194</guid>
		<description>[...] rather than a niche product: &#8220;However I can&#8217;t help but think that Surface is a bit like Telepresence, a technology that will be reserved for a very small number of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rather than a niche product: &#8220;However I can&#8217;t help but think that Surface is a bit like Telepresence, a technology that will be reserved for a very small number of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sipcat VoIP Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Telepresence or videoconferencing?</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-77869</link>
		<dc:creator>Sipcat VoIP Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Telepresence or videoconferencing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-77869</guid>
		<description>[...] Via: Web Worker Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via: Web Worker Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug K</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-75063</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-75063</guid>
		<description>most of business is politics. Political negotiations are best accomplished face-to-face, as there are many channels of information that cannot be captured in text. This is the market for telepresence, not tech worker bees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of business is politics. Political negotiations are best accomplished face-to-face, as there are many channels of information that cannot be captured in text. This is the market for telepresence, not tech worker bees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Cannell</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-74624</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Cannell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-74624</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://larry.cannell.org/desktop_conferencing_technologies&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;is something I wrote about conferencing eight years ago. Much of it still holds true today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://larry.cannell.org/desktop_conferencing_technologies" rel="nofollow">Here</a>is something I wrote about conferencing eight years ago. Much of it still holds true today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Cannell</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-74623</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Cannell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-74623</guid>
		<description>Mike, you nailed it. This is video conferencing trying to make another comeback. While I believe there are scenarios where this makes sense, these are few and far between.

 is something I wrote about conferencing eight years ago. Much of it still holds true today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, you nailed it. This is video conferencing trying to make another comeback. While I believe there are scenarios where this makes sense, these are few and far between.</p>
<p> is something I wrote about conferencing eight years ago. Much of it still holds true today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-74277</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 01:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-74277</guid>
		<description>I have been working in Telepresence for 5 years now, partially because it is a cool experience. When done well, it really does help faciliate human interaction; there are people on other continents that I feel I know pretty well but have never physically met. I would place it on the &quot;burst&quot; side of the work divide, as it really facilitates spontaneous meetings with distant participants. I don&#039;t think it is really going to change corporate cultures that much, though.

BTW, the original business plan, 10 years ago, was for &quot;TeleDining,&quot; with Suites being placed in Hotel restaurants. This was actually done back in the 1995-96 time frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been working in Telepresence for 5 years now, partially because it is a cool experience. When done well, it really does help faciliate human interaction; there are people on other continents that I feel I know pretty well but have never physically met. I would place it on the &#8220;burst&#8221; side of the work divide, as it really facilitates spontaneous meetings with distant participants. I don&#8217;t think it is really going to change corporate cultures that much, though.</p>
<p>BTW, the original business plan, 10 years ago, was for &#8220;TeleDining,&#8221; with Suites being placed in Hotel restaurants. This was actually done back in the 1995-96 time frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Wilson</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-74022</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-74022</guid>
		<description>Mike,

As I was reading I had a picture in my mind of King Lear raging against the storm.  Ok, maybe &quot;raging&quot; is a little bit of hyperbole.  Call it swimming against the tide.

Not that I don&#039;t sympathize.  As a numbers geek there have been plenty of times when I wished people would just go away so I could get some real work done.  

The reality, however, is that humans are social animals.  We can&#039;t go long without feeling the need to interact with other humans, and technology, no matter how efficient at information gathering and processing, is no substitute.  Important, yes, but different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>As I was reading I had a picture in my mind of King Lear raging against the storm.  Ok, maybe &#8220;raging&#8221; is a little bit of hyperbole.  Call it swimming against the tide.</p>
<p>Not that I don&#8217;t sympathize.  As a numbers geek there have been plenty of times when I wished people would just go away so I could get some real work done.  </p>
<p>The reality, however, is that humans are social animals.  We can&#8217;t go long without feeling the need to interact with other humans, and technology, no matter how efficient at information gathering and processing, is no substitute.  Important, yes, but different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesC</title>
		<link>http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-73997</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/30/telepresence-wave-of-the-past/#comment-73997</guid>
		<description>I noticed while watching 24 this year that they had a Cisco &quot;Telepresence Suite&quot; in their fictional White House. Maybe the older generation are impressed and feel it useful, I really couldn&#039;t see the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed while watching 24 this year that they had a Cisco &#8220;Telepresence Suite&#8221; in their fictional White House. Maybe the older generation are impressed and feel it useful, I really couldn&#8217;t see the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
