Beyond Cable and DSL for High-Speed Internet Access
You probably already have broadband Internet access, perhaps cable or DSL. But do you know about the other options for high-speed connectivity, ones available today or in the near future?
You might think you’ll never need anything else, but what if your cable company decides you’re using more bandwidth than you should? What if your Internet connection isn’t as reliable as your work requires? What if you decide to ditch city life for a B&B in the country — and your new neighborhood has no cable or DSL?
You do have other options, but don’t get too excited. There’s nothing much to jump up and down about here, except perhaps fiber to your house, and that’s not widely available… yet.
Satellite – If you live in one of the estimated 10 to 15 million households out of reach of cable or DSL, the logical choice is satellite Internet service. Satellite suffers from delays due to the long distances involved (this is known as latency); overall performance is said to be comparable to DSL, though the speeds are usually much slower.
Satellite is also more expensive than cable or DSL and usually requires a significant upfront investment for equipment and installation.
Fiber to the home (FTTH) – Those with the opportunity to sign up for fiber to the home should count themselves lucky. Verizon offers its FiOS service to homes in select areas and claims downstream speeds of up to 30 Mbps and upload of up to 5 Mbps, depending on where you live. You can get 5Mbps up/2 Mbps down for $39.99 a month with a one year agreement.
Because this requires laying fiber optic cable into your neighborhood and then to individual houses, it’s only available to a very small subset of the population right now. Even if you do qualify, it might take a long time to get it installed and ready to go.
If Verizon isn’t already providing telephone service in your area, don’t count on them for fiber to your home. Some of the smaller, independent telephone companies are providing this service. Those in the Sacramento area can check with Surewest. Otherwise, check with your local telephone company to see what their plans are for FTTH.
Broadband over powerline (BPL) – Wouldn’t it be great if instead of having all new infrastructure put into your neighborhood, you could just use the handy electrical wires that are already there? Power lines reach almost every house in America, potentially offering a solution other than satellite for the households outside the bounds of DSL and Cable Internet. But power lines weren’t designed for data transmission, and some in the know call power line cables “inherently unsuited for carrying the frequencies BPL uses.” In rural areas, a potentially important market for BPL, the economics may not make sense, due to the need to install and maintain repeaters.
The jury’s still out on BPL even as the money flows in. You probably ought not to count on it as an answer to your Internet access needs right now or any time in the near future. It just might help the power companies read their meters without sending people out to your house — but it’s unlikely to solve our Internet access needs, especially with our rapidly escalating demand for bandwidth-hogging videos.
Cellular 3G/EVDO – So forget the wires and cables, whether they’re already there or not, and look instead at the phone in your pocket talking to that cell tower in the distance. 3G means third generation, and that’s where you can get some mobile Internet access at DSL-comparable speeds. With EVDO Rev A, you could see speeds of 3.1 Mbps up/1.8 Mbps down, as long as everyone near you doesn’t decide to take the Rev A train at the same time. Let’s see how Om fares with his new Sprint EVDO Rev A card. Does it live up to the promise? Earlier generation EVDO cards don’t even reach DSL speeds and showed annoyingly high latency.
Cingular/AT&T has also introduced higher speed 3G service in some cities and is on target to cover most major US cities by the end of 2007. The 3G cards come with very stringent rules, and wireless companies frown upon excessive use of their wireless connections.
WiMAX – Yes, reader, there is a fourth generation (4G) mobile wireless solution, and it’s WiMAX. It offers greater range than wi fi (up to 30 miles range for fixed stations and 3 to 10 mile range for mobile), making it of interest to cellular providers like Sprint, who has said it will offer WiMAX services in 19 cities by April 2008. We might see average speeds four times faster than EVDO service, bringing true broadband mobile wireless into our lives.
Wondering whether your city’s on the list for Sprint’s initial rollout? Broadband paparazza Katie Fehrenbacher scored the details at CTIA last month. Another fixed wireless option for those who can’t wait is Clearwire, which has launched its broadband wireless service in a few cities and plans to cover most of the country over next few years. They currently use pre-WiMAX equipment but will eventually upgrade to the WiMAX standard when the gear is easily available.
Municipal wireless – Maybe you live in one of the 154 U.S. cities that have wi fi networks across some part of their metro areas or in the 132 with networks proposed or under construction. Different cities are choosing different revenue models for citywide wifi services ranging from advertising-based to government-funded to subscriptions with tiered rate structures based on income.
If you want to use your city’s wi fi network for Internet access in your home, you’ll likely need to buy equipment to bring the signal inside the house and perhaps sign up for a subscription to the service. If your work depends on Internet access, you might not want to put your trust in your local government or their subcontractor until they prove their reliability. Try it as a backup, maybe.
Bottom line: unless you can get fiber to the home, go for cable or DSL when available. Which should you choose? It depends. Cable download speeds can be up to 2 times faster than DSL. Cable, however, provides shared bandwidth so if you have a lot of YouTube-crazed neighbors you might be better off with DSL. DSL is distance-sensitive, so where you’re located relative to the phone company switching station matters.
If you’re curious what download and upload speed you’re getting right now, try this Flash-based speed test. Then tell us what results you get. You can post the details of broadband options in your city and the speeds you get on Broadband Wiki.






Great 101!
There’s another option, though is isn’t as sexy as some of the above (but it’s the only option for those of us in far rural areas): traditional business-class high-speed services like frame relay or T1 lines. You can provision these directly through your local carrier or through a national reseller like Bandwidth.com (which is who I currently use). Upside: high reliability, time-tested technology, business-class support, and not subject to the latency issues that make satellite an unattractive choice for many applications. Downside: expect to pay serious money, especially if it’s many miles from your closest switching center to your premises; this is only an option if you are writing off your service as a business expense, and doing actual business to write it off against – expect to pay hundreds of dollars or more per month, depending on the speed of your line.
Thanks, Mike, I was meaning to ask what you used, given you’re in a rural area. What exactly are you using? T1? And what kind of speeds do you see?
I’m currently on a full T1, provisioned through AT&T. Typically I see around 1450 kbps both ways for speed.
What are the chances of actually getting a good 3G signal in places with no cable or DSL service? Pretty low, I’d say.
I wouldn’t be so sure, Jesse. My wife and I are in the process of apartment hunting in New York, but we’re on a budget, so we’re looking in Brooklyn.
I had assumed that we’d have plenty of options for broadband. But not only has Verizon not rolled out FiOS in the neighborhood we’re looking at, they don’t even offer DSL. It looks like we will probably be able to get cable modem service.
Keep in mind, though, we’re talking about New York City. I can’t imagine that EVDO or other 3G isn’t available to at least some degree. It’s inherently easier for service providers to offer wireless service than wired services, because you don’t need to lay cable. You just need to pop up a few towers at regular intervals.
Of course, like I said, we’re on a budget, so we’ll probably be sticking with the cable modem. No EVDO for us.
Jesse: The article offers options for everyone — not just those outside the reach of cable and DSL.
A reminder that the US is a little backwards in broadband matters. Here in Latvia, at least in the capital Riga, the standard DSL broadband offerings from the national telecom operator Lattelecom are 2 Mbps or 5 Mbps download (plus free national calling) and 10 Mbps in som cases. Soon the basic package will be triple-play, up to 10 Mbps download plus up to 40 channels IPTV plus the free calls (and look for a VOIP product with low cost or local rate global calling soon). Other ISPs in Riga also offer 10 Mbps, while the national energy utility Latvenergo is putting FTTH in some new housing projects offering 100 Mbps. In the Latvian countryside broadband is problematic, but Triatel’s EVDO service is available in a growing footprint and at least two of the three mobile services have extended HSDPA to a number of rural towns. Latvia was ahead of Sweden in launching HSDPA. Meanwhile in Sweden 100 Mpbs (via Ethernet, I think) included in the rent for a condo-type arrangement (Swedes call it bostadsraett) is not uncommon, or 30-30 symettrical, for that matter.
What service do you recommend for emerging nations whose want for excellent internet service is high ie India, China and Africa
Hi, very good blog! Check my blog Best wishes from Argentina
http://conmotion.wordpress.com/
Lucas
Juris – Thanks for the insight into what’s available outside the U.S. Makes me a bit depressed. On a good day, I get 5Mbps down and not even 1Mbps up on my cable connection.
Another option is Clearwire. I have a bunch of PCs in the house, kids downloading stuff like there’s no tomorrow, and it works great. My review is at http://www.jeff-barr.com/?p=794 .
Brad, I said places with no DSL or cable. You just said you had cable . . . Find me an example where there is 3G but neither DSL nor cable.
Anne, What city are you in? I thought most of the GigaOM crew was near SF, the mecca of the IT industry where everyone is fabulously un/and/or wired :). Last summer I clocked 700 Kbps om my Powerbook G4 from a hammock. I was linked by WiFi to a Triatel EV DO unit in my summer house 35 km outside Riga. This summer, I hope to test Bite’s (www.bite.lv) 3.6 Mpbs HSDPA service. Having said that, I now hope someone from Korea will chime in about how 100 Mbps is so yesterday. I recall Kaan Terzioglu of Cisco saying here in Riga (a year ago at a conference) that 1 Gig to the home was where Korea and Japan were heading. As far as up speeds, now that I sometimes videoblog and that a news agency I string for is considering video contributions, this could be an issue. Doing YouTube uploads to link to the blog works, but sending an uncompressed 500 Mb DV file may get timeconsuming. Video is either going to drive some pretty dramatic bandwidth expansion (also at carrier and backhaul level) or it will kill those ISPs who can’t cope with it.
Anne, What city are you in? Aren’t all you GigaOm folks near SF, the Mecca of the IT industry where everyone is fabulously un/and/or wired? :). Last summer, I clocked 700 Kbps on a Powerbook G4 in a hammock linked by WiFi to a Triatel (EV DO) unit in my summer house 35 km outside of Riga. This summer I may try testing Bite’s (www.bite.lv) HSDPA (3.6 Mbps) out there. Having said that, I am waiting for someone from Korea to chime in and talk about how 1 Gigbit will soon be the norm for them.
Sorry, please remove the second comment, my mistake :)
Nice breakdown of high speed internet options currently available. I have Verizon FiOS FTTH both at work and at home. The reliability has been awesome so far, with just one cut out at work (due to a bad Optical Network Terminal). At home I have the 5/2 plan for 34.95 /w 1 year contract and at work I have the 15/5 plan with 6 static IPs for 99.95. Its a great deal, it is much faster, and much cheaper, than a T1 line.
Bandwidth estimates are dead on, but that could be because their network is so new it has yet to be overloaded!
Your article was really helpful in explaining the options. What we need now are solutions. Those who commented on what is available in other countries raise an interesting issue. How did they get do fast and we get so far behind. Not only are we slower, but more expensive. Most of those countries had public intervention with policies to promote the build out of high speed broadband to their citizens. That’s what we need too. There are some interesting policy suggestions and comparisons with other countries on http://www.speedmatters.org.
[...] by Om Malik Monday, April 9, 2007 at 10:30 AM PT | No comments WebWorkerDaily:Beyond Cable & DSL for broadband accessWebWorkerDaily: Clearing your inbox with minimal [...]
[...] my cable modem, I’m always open to alternative bandwidth, such as Anne Zelenka mentioned on webworkerdaily: particularly FiOS. Too bad we’re on ATT. For now, I’ll stick with cable modem and [...]
[...] read more | digg story [...]
[...] morning that explains some of the differences between fiber, cable, DSL and some other services. Web Worker Daily did a terrific job spelling out the differences in practical [...]
[...] the pieces are here, or nearly here, to improve matters. EVDO and WiMAX are making high-speed mobile access a reality in more and more places. Head-mounted displays can [...]